Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Ed. I think that this property was probably 'Charlton House'. It was the larger of the properties purchased with the land. It was a leasehold which was one of the last leases to expire. I think it was pulled down in the 1930's but would have to search land records to determine absolutely.


This link may be useful to you and you could also contact 'FOPYP' 'Friends of Peckhan Rye Park' on the same link.


http://www.foprp.org.uk/#/becoming-a-park/4543697137


Regards.

John


I think you're probably well-ahead of me, but have you seen the LONDON SOUTH OF THE THAMES by Sir Walter Besant? [http://www.archive.org/stream/surveyoflondon09besauoft/surveyoflondon09besauoft_djvu.txt]. This dates from 1912 and includes the following passage on Peckham Rye and the houses.


==========

Homestall Farm is surrounded by the Rye Park, and though still tenanted and used as a farm the ground belongs to the London County Council. This property and the houses standing to the west cost ?51,000, and their leases still have a few years to run. In making this property into a park, which was opened to the public in 1894, stabling, cottages, and an old pottery were removed, and the grounds laid out with tennis-courts, a cricket-ground, and a playground for children. The farm-house on this property is over two hundred years old, and with its weather-boarded sides and quaint windows looks very picturesque in comparison with the new keeper's lodge alongside.

==========


The other reference I can see refers to Charlton House being pulled down in the 1920s but is unsourced:

http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/461/a_to_z_of_parks/662/peckham_rye_park_and_common/1



Mike

The Early History page on the Friends of Peckham Rye Park web-site is "interesting". For the rest, remember the topography of the park as you read.


www.archive.org has scans of a large number of useful books for East Dulwich History. However, all pre-1914 books with material about East Dulwich need to be treated with caution. This includes the 1912 VCH which some people treat as authoritative.


The Besant is an elegant and attractive book, but the information provided needs examination.


Before 1905 the London County Council Parks Department (probaby directed by Sexby himself) had developed a "rural walk" between the Homestall Farm buildings. This is said to have been popular.


In 1908 the Parks Department invited tenders to tarmac the site of the former Homestall Farm buildings.


And the legal disputes continued...


The park opened in 1894. By 1895 Camberwell Council had launched legal action against the LCC alleging that the park had encroached upon Camberwell property.


John K



bthrough thehTh

I can't see a photo of the fountain mentioned on the FORPR web-site on the site so I've attached a copy here. It's taken from Sexby's "Municiplal Parks [...]" 1905 edition. The same photo appears in the 1898 edition but not so well reproduced. This gives a terminus ante quem.


English Heritage have recently released two high resolution photos of the farm house and the interior of the barn taken on 11 July 1908. EH state the buildings were demolished in August 1908.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Danny re-tiled and generally cleaned up the roof tiles on our front bay in SE22 a few weeks ago. He was fairly priced, and although the scope of the work changed slightly (something we couldn't have foreseen before removing the existing tiles), the price remained the same for the job. He and a colleague worked hard for three days (one more than initially planned) through pretty grim weather. With anything unexpected, he came to me with solutions rather than problems. They were polite, courteous, and left the site as tidy as they could after cutting roof tiles in the driving rain!
    • Perhaps first leak was caused by a combination of faulty rendering and a hole in the felt so re-rendering was able to fix it. This course of action wouldn't solve your current problem, it does sound like a separate issue. His guarantee would only cover the rerendering not any hole in the felt. Sorry this isn't what you want to hear.
    • I can't speak about other places but as someone who uses Mind in Forest Hill, these small studios are having a boom due to increased working from home.  Now I can work two days a week at home, I can use them at lunch time or early evening, it is a short walk from home so I can get changed and shower at home (so the studio does not need a big changing room or showers like a traditional gym),  whereas before Covid it would have a  been weekend only thing for me. I asume there are many like me so they can make a small space finacially viable. I am biased but Mind is great, it is a very inclusive woman friendly space, classes are very reasonable for instructor led classes, (there are different packages but you can get 10 for £100 if you oay in advance) and the fact there are very few bells and whistles keeps it affordable.   I prefer smaller studios as you don't want big classes for pilates and yoga as you need instructors to be able to see everyone and assess and adjust form for safety. 
    • I see a gap in the market and a stall in North Cross Road...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...