Jump to content

Gone: Chicco Next to Me Co-Sleeper Crib - ?60 charity donation


smurphy

Recommended Posts

We loved this crib: you can unzip one side and attach it to any bed to use as a co-sleeper, or zip up and use as stand-alone crib in your room or baby's. Good longevity; we used as co-sleeper when new born, and then zipped up side after a couple months; in either setting it didn't take up too much space. Our baby slept in it til 5.5 months, when she started rolling all the time in her sleep.


See all the details here (note, our crib isn't the same colour):


http://www.boots.com/chicco-next2me-side-sleeping-crib-sky-blue-10229443


Colour is light grey/silver. One fitted sheet included. Comes with fairly hard mattress base (which our baby slept on) but you can buy an additional new mattress topper easily online for about ?20 if you prefer.


?60 donation to the Juvenile Diabetes Research Fund (retails for about ?180). Pick up from SE15. From smoke and pet-free home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...