Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm planning to move my 9 month old son into my daughter's room and I'd be very grateful for any advice on this matter.

My son's been sleeping in our guest bedroom since he was 5mo, he really likes it there but as summer is coming so are the guests. So I'm being forced to move him. It was always the plan that he will be sharing room with his sister and I'm quite keen to do that just I'm not sure how to make it work. I'm worried that my 2yo daughter will disturb him as she never falls asleep straight away.


Any tips???


Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17154-9-mo-and-toddler-in-one-room/
Share on other sites

I've just moved our 7.5 month daughter E in with our nearly 3 year old eldest daughter P. We took the view we would trial it and it has gone better than expected. We started last week.

I held off as E has never slept through, relies on her dummy to soothe her and I was also worried that she would wake P and then we'd have to deal with 2 crying little ones.

In fact, E seems to be sleeping better, or maybe she's sleeping the same and I'm sleeping better; I don't wake up every time she grizzles, turns over etc as she is in the other room. And I'm surprised how P sleeps through E waking up - I had not expected that.

E still does wake early-ish and gets in with me and her dad, but I don't mind so much as I've had a decent sleep.

And tonight I've put them to bed together and it has worked - again!

Oh - and it's lovely to have my room back, read with the light on (I could go on with more reasons...!)

Good luck.

oldnewromantic you are responsible for baby no2. It was meant to be a girl. Must keep trying... ** kidding!


I have a 6 month old boy and nearly 5 year old girl. I think we may have missed the boat on them sharing... By the time boy is old enough my daughter will probably not want to share her very girly toys and space. But lets wait and see.


In terms of noise etc as long as baby goes down first it should be ok but you could do some trial runs before moving the them in same room.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...