Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jollybaby Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think you'll find that the rye cafe is guilty of

> this culinary crime too. Should I present them

> the recipe too?


xxxxxx


Well if they're calling it bubble and squeak and it isn't, up to you :)


If you don't care, then not.


I never go to the Rye Cafe.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How much does one pay for re-fried vegetable

> leftovers, otherwise destined for the scrap bin?


There's an index depending on one's choice of accompaniment. (Beginning with sprigs of thyme then baby tomatoes and leading all the way up to poached quail's egg.)

Presumably, if it's leftovers, the materials cost has already been covered in its original incarnation?


I prelude this guesstimate with the reassurance that I know sweet FA about the restaurant trade, so any abuse on the margin of my error would be silly ;-)


Labour's an interesting one - IIRC there's usually around 5 staff on in Franklins. If we assume they're paid an average of 1,500 per month, then that's a daily wage bill of around 250 quid.


If they averaged 40 covers a day, and each cover had an equal split of two dishes and booze that would be around 2 quid contribution to labour per dish.


I guess if regular overheads could amount to 350 quid a day, then there would be a contribution of 3 quid per dish to overheads.


VAT would be 1.50 on the dish (wow! incredible isn't it!), giving a gross margin of around 1 quid per dish of B&S.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Got it..

>

> "Ox heart, bubble & squeak - 7.50"

>

> That's got to be at least 30p worth of core

> ingredients.


xxxxxxx


Yeh I nearly ordered that instead of what I had, thank God I didn't, it was more expensive and I'd still have been pissed off at the lack of crispiness :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...