Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think cheating on your school work should be your first choice - how will that help you learn? To improve your English vocabulary and grammar skills you need to do the work yourself, make mistakes (which is fine - that's how you learn) and improve. If you don't understand a point, I would urge you to ask your English teacher and to say you don't understand and I would have thought they will explain things to you and maybe try to line up some extra help in areas you find difficult. Also, explain this to your parents - they should help you as well. Good luck - I hope it goes well. Keep trying!
If you get someone to write your essay then you will be cheating (plagiarism) - cheating those in your place of education and cheating yourself. It is fine to ask for advice and guidance - that's what education is about - you learn from others and then apply your learning. But using someone else to write your coursework is something which, if discovered by e.g. a university, could lead to your expulsion from the course. And rightly so. Any qualification you otherwise gain will not be yours but the essay writer's. How would you feel if you found yourself being treated by a doctor who had got someone else to sit his/ her exams and do his/ her course work? Reassured? Happy?
If it is I hope potential customers are reading these responses. Cheating is shameful. Anyone who proposes cheating should be ashamed. Anyone offering cheating services leaves their clients open to significant sanctions if discovered. Universities, certainly, are using increasingly sophisticated methods to identify plagiarism. Luckily the 'coursework' elements of many secondary qualifications are being reviewed and reduced.

If it is a spam advert I don't think much of the level of spelling/grammar they're providing!


Presumably they were intending (if it's spam) to address a demographic which needed help. A perfectly drafted request might have led one to wonder why help was needed. This one makes it perfectly clear. If it is 'secret spam' it is actually good secret spam on that account, and maybe well targeted. Except the ED Forum probably has relatively few potential customers for the service as its readers. So actually, well targeted in terms of content, but not in terms of channel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well he couldn’t deliver anything better than a poor brexit. Because no such thing exists 
    • Fair points jazzer. But it begs the question, on what information are people basing their opinion? because if it’s x or the right wing media the of course they will believe nothing has happened but people who claim to be motivated by rising immigration numbers are either ignorant of or don’t care the those numbers have dropped significantly since Labour got in Hospital waiting lists are finally showing improvements after years of getting worse people on minimum wage are better off We haven’t had a random general election or new prime minister just months after the last one  compare that to Tory chaos Important relations with other countries (important for long term trade and growth) have improved under labour given the size of the mess they inherited it’s far better than many give credit for  and the prospect of a Badenoch and/or farage govt returning us to the chaos of last 10 years? No thanks (I could do a long list of things Labour have done wrong or badly but that’s for another thread. I did not vote for Labour, but all things considered they are a massive improvement on what came before. Unfortunately we have a bunch of far right agitators kicking off around the country because they are cry babies which gives impression country is going downhill  when it’s really not)  
    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...