Jump to content

Recommended Posts

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Eh? Mathematics -> quantity is the pall mall to

> philosophy, not a loop.

> Though i have found a loop....



It is now but it wasn't - you can see they have now suspended the editing of "Quantity" (which earlier led straight to magnitude which led to the loop) for new or unregistered users because of what they call "significant edit warring over a few links" hmmmm... I suspect dirty pool old chap!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439362
Share on other sites

You're all bloody morons. ;-)


Right.


Next go.


When light goes from one 'medium' to another, it changes speed. A 'medium' is glass, water or david_carnell. Think of this a bit like running into a swimming pool. You get slowed down.


Light isn't made up of 'white' light, it's a mixture of other colours, and when you see them all together it looks white. For example a television has red green and blue colours, but when you see them all together they appear white.


So when you shine white light through a 'medium' (e.g. glass or water), the red green and blue elements get slowed down by different amounts, and dependent upon the angle of viewing can get knocked of course by different amounts.


This is what happens when you see a rainbow - the sunlight has shone through water droplets, and the red light has gone straight on, and the blue light has been deflected. So you see a rainbow.


You can play the same trick with glass at an angle - so an angular peice of glass, for example a cheese shaped one (a prism) can break white sunlight into a rainbow arrangement of all the colours.


So far so good, and a bit dull, because we all know this.


So now the interesting part.


If you play this game with sunlight it doesn't go into a complete rainbow, it has black lines in it. Black lines means no light is reaching at these colours.


What we've discovered is that certain chemicals, or elements, absorb the light at certain colours. This is important, because it's what makes colours for us. For example if you shine a light on blue paint, the paint absorbs the energy from all the light except the blue light, which is reflected: so you see blue.


So some chemicals absorb the light of some colours - almost like saying that the sun is 'coloured'.


So by looking at the black lines, we know what chemicals are there.


This is why we know what the sun is made of!! Cool huh?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439433
Share on other sites

I should add, that it also gives us a pretty good idea of what david_carnell is made of.


However, the effects are best achieved by evaporating materials into a bright light, and last time we did that to david_carnell he was really pissed off.


BTW - It's called 'spectroscopy', and it's a really cool job. Knowing what things are made of gave us stuff like iron.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439434
Share on other sites

Hugey, we might all be morons, but please help me, what is the appropriate reaction to a physics lesson?


Are you reading a physics book at the moment and reporting back the exciting stuff you find? I gave up physics after GCSE because my teacher (with a glass eye and turned up collars on her denim jacket) kept telling me she was just like me.


But science is cool and I applaud your attempt to engender excitement in us philistines. For myself I'm particularly excited about the discovery of Egyptian pyramids by satellite imagery - but, but but but, what would be the non-moronic response to your puppyish enthusiasm for spectroscopy?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439466
Share on other sites

:))


I'm just having a bit of fun - I thought the perfectly efficient winkey smiley would have conveyed the fact that I don't think you're all morons?


These things are just really cool, no?


I'm sharing things with you that before yesterday I didn't know!!! I'm really excited by them! They're cool!


My exclamation mark key is really gettting worn...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439471
Share on other sites

In a bid to demonstrate to everyone who may be reading this exactly how bored I am at the moment, I?ve found 2 loops so far with this business. One was yesterday and that is way to far back to remember the details of. The other just now:-


Ancient Greek - Greek language ? Greeks ? Nation - Sovereign state ? Sovereignty ? Socrates - Classical Greece ? Culture - Alfred L. Kroeber - United States ? Americas - Spanish language - Romance languages - Indo-European languages - Language family ? Language ? Human ? Taxonomy - Ancient Greek.


This is assuming that you mean following the first link in the article not those in the italicised notes or ones relating to pronunciation.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439486
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> :))


Yeah dufus. But you should know by now that I don't do the smilie punctuation face (or indeed any punctuation face, unless under the influence of anti-rage medication) - I too am just having a bit of fun.


And it is really cool.


However, we're in the Lounge, where deviation is the norm.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439489
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ancient Greek - Greek language ? Greeks ? Nation -

> Sovereign state ? Sovereignty ? Socrates -

> Classical Greece ? Culture - Alfred L. Kroeber -

> United States ? Americas - Spanish language -

> Romance languages - Indo-European languages -

> Language family ? Language ? Human ? Taxonomy -

> Ancient Greek.


Nope. Sovereign state - State - Social Sciences...


it's all familiar territory from there.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439497
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I should add, that it also gives us a pretty good

> idea of what david_carnell is made of.

>

> However, the effects are best achieved by

> evaporating materials into a bright light, and

> last time we did that to david_carnell he was

> really pissed off.


Indeed I was. As everyone knows I am made of snips and snails, and puppy dogs tails.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17440-emc2/page/2/#findComment-439540
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River. When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...