Jump to content

Recommended Posts

No banning no judging from my side and no victimism here. My social life outside east Dulwich is good enough for me..

Just the travelling bothers me but than it happens that you live in an area and than your job changes and suddenly you need to travel ..or you find a gf/bf on the other side of the city..

I travel to meet people and no necessary needs to be on the other side of the city.

Happy this way so I suggested you to eventually try travel..

Regarding single women in ed I honestly don t think there is one a part from lavender.. and if there was one surely nutty will scare her away..ahahah love you nutty but your ways are the cause of some of your social probs

Best to all

I don't remember writing that, today I'm still single and wasn't loving it, as I needed a strong person to carry the shopping, the bloody shopping trollies keep braking on me and had to buy yet another one. And also couples on the bus were smooching and making me sick.






pato Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lavender27 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm single and loving it.

>

> Yeah sure being the only woman with no stroller or

> ring must be easy life once you just take your

> headset off..

> :) ;)

pato Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Saffron Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's just a mystery why single ladies aren't

> > flocking to you!

>

>

> There are many mysteries in life Saffron..one of

> them is assumptions..


Indeed, Pato. Indeed. Nevertheless it remains the case that Ron's Ron shirt is just as bed as Ron himself.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will.
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
    • Why it a strange first post Sue?  We all have to start somewhere! These kids have created a situation where they have been very unpleasant. Surely their physical appearance etc is a key factor in identifying them?  I don’t understand. Are you defending these kids? 
    • I can do the research but are more people watching cricket on TV now it went to the higher bidder or in 05 when it was on Channel 4?  I think that less kids are into cricket since it went off terrestrial.  I suppose I should have had TMS on.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...