Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can give laymans advice (you'd need to follow-up with qualified advice obviously) having fitted several burners and having a house with until recently 7 working fireplaces (only 5 now though !).

I've fitted several multi-fuel burners (for own use) and am familiar with some of the options.

Free info if you want it, to accompany other avenues you may be chasing.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175221-chimney/#findComment-1198809
Share on other sites

when I had one opened up the installer put a smoking pellet in the grate to see if there was an updraft and he swept it and made sure the brickwork inside was sound since it hadn't been used for years.

This area is a smokeless zone so you can only use smokeless fuel but if I remember correctly you are allowed a Yule log over the Xmas period.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175221-chimney/#findComment-1198812
Share on other sites

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> when I had one opened up the installer put a

> smoking pellet in the grate to see if there was an

> updraft and he swept it and made sure the

> brickwork inside was sound since it hadn't been

> used for years.

> This area is a smokeless zone so you can only use

> smokeless fuel but if I remember correctly you are

> allowed a Yule log over the Xmas period.


Doesn't the chocolate make a mess in the grate?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175221-chimney/#findComment-1198859
Share on other sites

Judging by the increase in the smell of burning wood in ED over the last 10 years he will have a massive job enforcing a ban on burning wood. I don't fancy his chances.

There are DEFRA approved woodburners with filters available which we are supposed to use in this smokeless zone and they would be a much better option than burning wood logs on an open fire- which is what people will do if they can't have a wood burner....

The Yule log tradition is upheld as it is followed by Druids and Pagans today

http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/paganism/holydays/wintersolstice.shtml

Druids are officially recognised today by the charity commission as a religion and so the Yule Log winter solstice tradition has to be allowed but is probably restricted to some time limit

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175221-chimney/#findComment-1198940
Share on other sites

Wood burning is extremely bad for the environment and public health. It causes more global warming than gas or electric heating and the particulates nox and o3 produced are causing countless health problems from asthma to death. It is as much a problem as smoky old diesel vehicles and in populous areas where people are raising families Khan is quie right to seek to ban it .


http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h2757/rr-0

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175221-chimney/#findComment-1199027
Share on other sites

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you were thinking about fitting a Wood Burner,

> one thing to consider is that

> The Mayor of London Sidiq Khan is looking to

> Restrict/Ban their use in London.

>

> Bar-b-ques Next no doubt.

>

> DulwichFox


#FAKENEWS


Nope, not true. He wants to move to a 'ready to burn' woodfuel, in Euro 5 approved type appliances. It's a sensible move and inline with other developed economies.


And BBQ's are already exempt under the legislation, charcoal being the original smokeless fuel. Only when indoors in a commercial situation is there legislation, that covered already by the relevant authorities.



But that kind of news isn't as sexy as BAN WOOD BURNING STOVES is it.


No!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175221-chimney/#findComment-1200057
Share on other sites

#FAKENEWS ? How American Trumpish is that..


Air pollution: Sadiq Khan calls for ban on wood-burning stoves


https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/29/air-pollution-sadiq-khan-calls-for-ban-on-wood-burning-stoves


No he will not Ban them. He will Charge people to use them Ok to pollute as long as you pay.



Foxy

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175221-chimney/#findComment-1200232
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Seabag is right. The Guardian article you link to is misleading. There are stoves that are approved for smoke control areas and a new standard which is being phased in for new stoves bought. They are looking to ban the burning of wood and other fuels that produce lots of smoke and inefficient stoves. But there are already rules for this.


Most of the stoves on sale now (or will soon be) Sia compliant, which is the new standard across Europe. They produce very little smoke. If you see smoke coming out of a chimney, it's very probably an open fire or poorly seasoned wood.


They AREN'T banning stoves. It's a poorly written article.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/175221-chimney/#findComment-1276896
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...