Jump to content

Thanks for all your advice ;).Family lawyer needed to translate a paragraph below into plain wmglish


Recommended Posts

Hi I am reaching out to someone who has experience in legal speak - can someone read the below and confirm what it means ASAP thanks


The Respondent Husband shall pay to the Applicant wife periodical payments for the benefit of the children of the family Harvey and Leo. Payments shall be at the rate of 6000.00 per annum per child, payable monthly in advance by standing order from the Absolute and shall end on:-

(i) each child attaining the age of 21 or

(ii) each child entering full time employment, whichever shall be the later; or

(iii) a further order.

Which bit are you finding difficult to understand? 6,000 divided by 12 (or thereabouts)= monthly amount per child. This will end when they are 21 or in full time employment or if there is another order.


Corrected because I wrote in haste and based my sums originally on weekly rather than monthly - Many aposl!!

Does it not just mean that the husband will pay the wife ?1,000 per month (?500 per child) in advance by standing order until the children reach the age of 21, get full time jobs, or the court makes a new order which supercedes this one?

The payments are to start from the date of the Decree Absolute i.e. the date the divorce is final. Otherwise it is pretty straightforward as explained above.


You can get further free advice from Rights for Women legal helpline - http://rightsofwomen.org.uk/get-advice/women-london/



'For women in London

AscentLondon Councils


As part of the Ascent project we offer a dedicated advice line to women in London.



Domestic violence, sexual violence and family law


We advise women who have been affected by domestic and sexual violence on:


injunctions such as non-molestation orders and occupation orders

divorce and finances on relationship breakdown

parental responsibility and arrangements for children

lesbian parenting


Call 020 7608 1137

Monday 11am-1pm, Tuesday 2-4pm, Wednesday 2-4pm, Thursday 2-4pm


The line is closed on bank holidays




You can contact us for initial advice or at various stages of your legal case. You can call whether you have a solicitor or not.


We can signpost you to solicitors and other organisations who might also be able to help you.


Find more information on family law, domestic and sexual violence and criminal law here



Important information


The Ascent advice line offers free legal advice to women in London only. If you are outside London contact our national family law advice line or our national criminal law advice line


We can only advise in English on the law as it applies in England and Wales.


The advice line can be extremely busy. Please keep trying to get through.




Got more questions about our advice line? Go to Frequently asked questions.'

Hi so basically it is correct that the payments stop once the child has either reached 21 or if they have got full. Time paid work before the age of 21 ? Apologies for poor grammar writing on iPhone with poor eyesight - thanks for feedback so far

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...