Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just finished The Cornish Trilogy by Robertson Davies - absolutely loved it.


Am struggling with ED Book choice Scriptorium by Paul Auster - v. boring and keep finding other books to read.


Much nicer to be reading "Snakehead" by Anthony Horowitz - the latest in the Alex Rider series - only a couple of chapters to go.

I'm on the Origins of the British by Stephen Oppenheimer. I regretted not buying it when I saw it in a GRafton St book shop, so glad I spotted it a few days back.

Already very interesting reading.

It would seem we've all be sold a bit of mythology in our schools as regards who we are (it covers the whole of the british isles) all down to some iffy conclusions come to by victorian linguists, archaeologists and historians.

Barry


I hadn't thought about the era of the setting - nice one. Of course you could argue that much of the existance described in the book does actually tale place in the current day in some countries


I'm not 100% convinced the ending is redemptive - ie is it internal (I'm trying not to include spoilers) or did it actually happen.


I did feel on every page I was asking the question "What would I do?" - something which was intended I'm sure


I also find it totally convincing that so much of humanity did what it did in the book - we only have to look at how people interact over queues, social services etc to see how few people genuinely look out for all others (not just a known few)

You could be right, Sean ... in fact, the book as a whole has a dream- (or, rather, nightmare-) like quality.


ETA: Yes, I think that people might behave as they do in the book. After all, how else could they "survive"? Still, and this is why the book is redemptive, the child does not behave that way. He want to help the other boy they encounter, wants to take care of the dog (memory is hazy here ...) to loook after the old man, etc., etc.


I am glad that such a high-quality book is being so widely read. Inevitably, though, there is talk of a film. Which might not be a bad thing - if done properly.

Time flies ;-)


For some reason, talking about it has brought to mind aspects of Deadwood (the simply awesome HBO show starring Lovejoy. The Essex Antiques dealer. Not the sometime-obnoxious Chelsea loving tv presenter)


Something about the brutality of relationships when much of what we take for granted simply isn't there

Being Sky-less I never saw it - believe it was dead good tho...


Ae we on The Road still, or the Proposition?


If the Road, yes, I kind of agree. You only appreciate civilisation when its not there. Its real power is that you just don't see it.


Of course, in the book it is made pretty clear that civilisation has wiped itself out. But what brings us together and apart are two different impulses towards life and death that work together and apart at the same time. (Ha! Knew this would come in useful ... Reading Freud's Civilization and its Discontents at the mo, if you're wondering where this has been plagiarised from). And in the book the boy is clearly the life instinct, the bud that grows out of the ashes.


Throughout the book there is an interplay between the innocence and experience of the child and the father, though each has aspects of both - the boy can be very wise.


The book, like many others, is full of dualisms.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River. When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...