Jump to content

Breastfeeding in public (surely there cannot still be an issue...)


Recommended Posts

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I gave you a chance Rendel, could you think of any

> reason etc


You've been answered sensibly by others. But if you insist, no I can't think of any reason why someone would complain about a woman breastfeeding in the fruit aisle of a supermarket. Please explain why this would be a problem for you.

I don't really understand the fruit aisle example. For a start, I have literally never seen a woman breastfeed in the middle of a supermarket aisle. But if she did, it wouldn't bother me in the slightest. Why would it?


Some of the views on here are breathtaking. Some facts:


1) Women have the 'breast is best' message drummed into them constantly from health visitors, medical professionals etc.


2) As other posters have said, you really can't just switch newborn babies back and forth from breast to bottle. You can when they're older, but not the first three months or so. Some babies will never accept a bottle.


3) Newborn babies need feeding every three hours or so. Night and day. It can take up to an hour to breastfeed. Very difficult to plan trips out in that small 'window', especially as babies do not always conform to schedules.


4) Most restaurants and bars do not have a room set aside for breastfeeding. In fact I would go so far as to say I have never seen such a room in any bar or restaurant I have ever been in. The most you can hope for is a chair by the communal sinks in posher establishments. The more likely scenario is that if you wanted to take yourself off to a 'private' area it would mean you were sitting for 45 minutes in a grim loo cubicle while your food got cold outside and your companion sat alone.


5) I have never met a woman who was 'exhibitionist' about breastfeeding. Though I would say that many of us (not all) get into a bit of a baby bubble and stop feeling self-conscious about it. I certainly got to the point where I could answer the door to a surprised postman with a baby latched on and not even think twice about it. That's because - surprise - feeding your hungry baby is an entirely natural behaviour.


What would the anti-public-bf have mothers do? Stay inside for first six months of their baby's life? Because if you go out with a baby, there will inevitably be a time when you get 'caught short' and you are forced to feed in public. It's no one's ideal situation. But it's either that or you are literally trapped at home 24 hours a day for months on end.

Oh, and I forgot to add, expressing milk into a bottle is the devil's work. I'm sure there are some women who manage it merrily; I have never met one. For me it would involve a miserable and painful 30 minutes on my own to produce maybe a quarter of a bottle - which was then a faff to store and reheat at the right temperature. So again, not a solution that works for everyone.
I've been thinking about a scenario where I would think breastfeeding was "inappropriate, inconsiderate and selfish". I can't think of one, including the 'tea at Claridges' which seems to be regarded as a good example. Now that's only my view, and of course there may be others who feel differently. But that doesn't mean they are entitled to interfere in someone else's behaviour, nor expect that the proprietor should impose rules to suit them. Years ago lots of people would have objected strongly to seeing kids in pubs at any time, and some still do, but the world has changed, and I'm afraid people have to get comfortable with that.
I'm overwhelmed. Most of my threads die a quick death. Only thing I have to add to the generally spot on comments, is when I saw a watershed. My sister feeding in the late 80s it still seemed to be a thing not done in public. and then a few years later no issue. Wasn't sure if the first of my peer group was an early adopter, whether there was some turning point in the early 90s, or whether my evidence based on a sample of two is over-simplifying things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yiddish is written in Hebrew script, traditionally, so any attempt to use 'Roman' script will be transliteration, as noted. Hebrew script does not have vowels as such, so any vowels used will try to copy the Yiddish sound of the word. Bagel and Beigel are both correct transliterations of the Yiddish word. 
    • Have they still not fixed it? that's pretty shabby. I took this picture on New Year's Day and it's been like this at least since before Xmas.     
    • To be fair, if I saw you eating any of the parcels I'd have walked out. I noticed last night that the illuminated sign now describes this place as the POT OFFICE. Presumably THC vapes are more profitable than being a drop-off point for bloody Evri
    • Housebuilding isn't that profitable and housebuilders don't have social responsibilities. The affordable housing component is just a tax on new builds. It's a total failure by government - a fantasy belief that the private sector is going to solve the state's social housing crisis for free. It's like expecting Tesco to solve child humgrr by giving away a percentage of its products. It's not gonna work - it just slows down and disincentivises private sector construction of new housing. The only solution to the housing crisis is a massive increase in the supply of housing, not a couple of "affordable" flats in a new development. The state needs to solve the problem of NIMBYs (one of whom is prominent on this thread), get out of the way of private sector developers building private rentals and homes for sale, and borrow to build a huge amount of social housing.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...