Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


I'm at the daunting stage of trying to pick a buggy for my as yet unborn first baby. We have the option of a second hand Bugaboo Gecko for about the same price as a Maclaren techno XLR but advice on any other buggy would also help!


I need to walk the dog every day which means crossing grass and bumpy terrain. Can the Maclaren handle this well enough with those smaller wheels, or is Bugaboo a better option?


Also, is it possible to have the infant/child facing you with a Maclaren like you can with a bugaboo? It doesn;t look like it, but I wanted to check a I like that feature a lot.


THANKS For any help and advice!


Helena

Helena


Im a dog owner & Mum of two & I walk a lot off road.


My advice is to get a 3 wheeler with big wheels. Use a Ergo sling if you are up to it post birth & while baby is little & even in back carry mode when over 6 months if you are fit or not going far (I love mine now youngest is nearly 3 & will mostly walk, but I can sling her on my back to get her home if she gets tired).


In hindsight I should have got a Mountain Buggy in the first place with the pram option (facing you) for first few months, then you have that option too - I didn't research enough - I reckon they are best bet for Mums like us.


Otherwise, something similar but less expensive.


Worth looking on EBay - Mountain Buggys are very well made so even 2nd or 3rd hand should be in fab condition.


Oh & take the Mclaren as your back up/in the car/going on buses buggy/going on holiday buggy.


Hope this helps. PM me if you like, I've had A LOT of Buggys including a Bugaboo, 3 wheeler, Stokke, Micralite, Zap....and the Mountain Buggy has been by far the best all rounder.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...