Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You actually posted '73!!!!'. Where does it say in

> the rules that you score a point for that?


There's nothing in the rulebook stating that the number may not be succeeded by punctuation.


I scored another one, but I think there was an exclamation mark there too (Eurozone). Meh...


Effing pedant...


I aint playin no more...didn't get such petty balderdash from Master Quids...


*sulks*


And Frankito, you swear as much as you like! Be most vociferous in fact.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18250-73s/page/2/#findComment-452453
Share on other sites

now, now play nicely.


I saw your 1st 73 LM and thought it was , well, let's say 'well researched'. I don't think it matters that you had to trawl (I said Trawl not troll) back a couple of weeks or so, it just proves your dedication to the game.


I must say if all players took it as seriously and were as committed then we would no doubt be enjoying the jet-set thrills of such diverse-spin offs as: setenta y tres, dreiundsiebzig, soixante-treize, drie?nzeventig, εβδομήντα τρία and even the exotic 七十三.


*sighs and dreams of long games of settantatre by Lake Como*

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18250-73s/page/2/#findComment-452469
Share on other sites

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I suggest you keep your eyes peeled

> maxxi..........very peeled.



As you posted this did you not feel a "whoosh" and detect the faint odour of rusks as LM sneaked in whiloe you held the door open?


I think the ref is taking backhanders.


And LM? These socks are disgusting!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18250-73s/page/2/#findComment-452565
Share on other sites

They look like they were designed the last time MC won the cup - must've had some left over.


Stop changing the subject. I am chaining the wheels of your pram and banning you from loitering at thread gates without a responsible adult present (not you AlanM, you are putty in LM's mitten-clad hands).

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18250-73s/page/2/#findComment-452570
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...