Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I guess so, but it also reinforces a 'them & us' mentality. Maybe it would be good to offer some mixed sessions, with limited numbers if need be.


I do see your point, and was not posting because I minded the play area being closed to the general public today, I just think in general it is good for children to mix (& surely people would stare less in time if it became more normal to all be playing together?).


Just a thought, and I admit to having very little experience with handicapped children so this is posted with intent to understand tye reasoning more than anything.

Hmm not really, what the kids and parents gain from having the playground to themselves overides anything else. Some autistic children need a lot of physical space around them and may have behavioural problems. Having a non judgemental, safe, enclosed, stimulating place to go is like gold dust. Many families with disabled children rarely get the opportunity to get out for a variety of reasons. Unfortunately patience tolerance and understanding by neuro typical children and parents doesnt always happen. . and I do agree it would be good to offer some additional supervised mixed sessions with limited numbers. Southwark Council take note :)

Seconding this really. Long may this continue!!!


H


Lukedaisy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmm not really, what the kids and parents gain

> from having the playground to themselves overides

> anything else. Some autistic children need a lot

> of physical space around them and may have

> behavioural problems. Having a non judgemental,

> safe, enclosed, stimulating place to go is like

> gold dust. Many families with disabled children

> rarely get the opportunity to get out for a

> variety of reasons. Unfortunately patience

> tolerance and understanding by neuro typical

> children and parents doesnt always happen. . and

> I do agree it would be good to offer some

> additional supervised mixed sessions with limited

> numbers. Southwark Council take note :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They have cheese now as Heritage cheese has closed down 
    • Heritage Cheese is just around the corner though in the village
    • There are moves to place Thames Water into a SAR (Special Administration Regime) effectively renationalising it and wiping out its debt.  But then what ?  There is also rumours of lookmg for a new owner, including a Chinese backed group that already owns Northumbrian water and UK power.  Is that a controversial move as it places another of our inferstructural assets in foreign hands?  Should it be renationalised and run as a not for profit government organisation, placing investment and improvements before  shareholders? This in itself would adversely impact pension funds who have invested in utilities.  Its fairly obvious that Thames Water needs rescuing or restructure but what is the optimum and correct path to take ?   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...