Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Someone posted this up on the Guardian site. Considering the sanctions handed out (quite rightly) to Andy Gray and co, should Sharon Osbourne ever be allowed on TV again after this piece of quite sexist and quite revolting advocacy of mutilation and domestic violence?


And as for the laughter of the audience, words fail me. Such a light hearted and fun topic. Not. At least Sara Gilbert tried to inject some sanity.


 

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would you be so comfortable if a group of men on

> TV were discussing a 'revenge' rape or an honour

> killing and one said he thought it was 'quite

> fabulous'? Would that be acceptable?



No it wouldn't be acceptable, and I understand what you're saying, but this is just trash TV, I don't think it's worth etting particularly upset about.

Shazza Osbourne isknown for being a twot so we shouldn't be surprised by her eagerness to offend. It's a bit like getting offended by The Viz which would be stupid cos it's hilarious. Mind you, if I ever gave it to my Mum to read I know she wouldn't like it


(*mother: secretly offended by her affinity with Mrs Brady Old Lady*)

It's in poor taste, no doubt about that. It is a daytime trash tv programme but that's not any excuse either. Having said that, to then say why should men care about rape, equility etc just because one stupid woman exercises no boundaries of taste is equally daft.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having said that, to then say why

> should men care about rape, equility etc just

> because one stupid woman exercises no boundaries

> of taste is equally daft.


Agreed. Unfortunately I couldn't find a completely clean copy of the programme and, as I said, didn't actually make it that far when I first posted.


The point is that what Osbourne said was beyond the pale and she should be treated the same way Andy Gray and Ron Atkinson were. Her remarks were very much in the same league of offensiveness and she should be off the TV for good.

Andy Gray and Ron Atkinson were employees of the channel they made their comments on so firing them was simple. Ms Osbourne is freelance so she can't be fired and nor can any kind of ban be exercised - there are hundreds of tv companies alone in the US.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd7rg7wjvgvo I also consider what she said was racist, but worse, unnecessary designed to stir up conflict.  The advertisers are free to use whoever they want to sell their product.  I'm quite happy for them to depict multiracial Britain, or gay/trans friendly (as per London Underground), disability aware etc etc. From time to time I'll see a more traditional product where everyone in the ad is white.  So??
    • Don't think so, Elizabeth line stops there. Think you mean Drayton Green on the old Ealing Broadway  to Greenford push/pull line. Anyway, it was least used station in London a couple of years ago, now it's Sudbury and Harrow.
    • Anyone else noticing this hike on their annual premium?  In the SE22 code.   Tried all the usual platforms for a better quote (without luck) 
    • Don't do Instagram.  Is this Geof Marshall? - a legend! Here is a link to his series on least used stations, West Drayton being the London one.    If we went back in time Honor Oak on the old Crystal Palace high line was down to tens a day, and there was this bizarre extension to the Central Line that went to Ongar, at it's lowest point before closing down to 85 passengers a day.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...