Jump to content

Recommended Posts

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> True, nothing wrong with doubting authority etc,

> it's to be encouraged, but supplanting it with

> conspiratorial whataboutery kinda undermines it...


As mentioned above, if the mildest suggestion that our government may have got things wrong, or that it's at least worth investigating alternative explanations, is to be classified as conspiracy theorism, that's a very sorry state of affairs.

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It was the russians, this is not really moot,

> despite the dots being joined by conspiracists.Its

> a message, delivered by the means of grim

> performance art. it isnt a messsage directly

> however to the UKG, this is a secondary issue- it

> is also message for the home audience about

> betrayal and reach. It is directly aimed to the

> Russian expat community here- those that still

> have favour and hold Vlad the poisoners assets.

> His wealth is loosely estimated to be hundred of

> billions, none of it in his own name.

>

> Its a crass slavic re-enactment of the horse head

> in the bed scene if would wanted to express it in

> digestable popular culture terms. things are are

> rarely as complex as they may look.


It must be great to be you, so certain, so right, so utterly and ineffably pompous and arrogant.

The problem with Theresa May is - imagine we only ever heard one side of the argument on Brexit and the EU didn't say anything - We'd think it was great, going superb, negotiations progressing well, a deal imminent. Remember that she didn't want a running commentary.


She's authoritarian and secretive by nature, and surrounded by people who think it's OK to lie to parliament (yes you Ms McVey). So I take everything her government say with a little pinch of salt and look at the evidence for myself (which in this case still points at Putin)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> As mentioned above, if the mildest suggestion that

> our government may have got things wrong, or that

> it's at least worth investigating alternative

> explanations, is to be classified as conspiracy

> theorism, that's a very sorry state of affairs.


I'm sure you'll get over it Comrade...

  • 1 month later...
It's all gone very dull on the forum. Maybe everyone's on holiday. Anyway US taken sanctions against Russia for the chemical attack on the UK. Trump hasn't tweeted to protest so it all must be true. Stuff that up your pipes and smoke them you conspiracy theorists!

I suspect that in both the US and the UK there has been plenty of 'distraction' politics going on. Why would the US do this now is what I'd like to know?


Strange this happens on the same day a 'source' claimed the Trumps received over 3.6 billion paid in two instalments by the Saudi's to renege on the Iran nuclear agreement. You'll find it on twitter @TrueFactsStated if you're interested.

There are two Americas, one continues as normal, diplomacy, the rule of law etc.


The other is Trump's. There will be relations between the UN, the Foreign Office, US Foreign policy and Counter-terrorism. I don't see the timing of this being suspicious.


Others may.

Trumpy reminds me of Biff in Back to the Future 2, holed up in his tower throwing hissy fits. Where's our Marty McFly to save the day?


Was looking for an appropriate image, seems like it's true!...:)

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/23/back-to-the-future-writer-bad-guy-biff-was-based-on-donald-trump

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trumpy reminds me of Biff in Back to the Future 2,

> holed up in his tower throwing hissy fits. Where's

> our Marty McFly to save the day?

>

> Was looking for an appropriate image, seems like

> it's true!...:)

> https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/23/back-

> to-the-future-writer-bad-guy-biff-was-based-on-don

> ald-trump



But how - they'd need a time machine - edit: and even the article is two years old - yet they still knew... amazing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...