Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One of the pleasures of walking dogs in Peckham Rye park is the chance to let them have a drink and a splash in stream. In fact, it's often a necessity, given Southwark's long-long failure to set up the half-dozen or so pipe stands and drinking troughs that should be located round the park and rye.


Lower down it gets very muddy so the best 3 sites are upstream: by the two bridges, and, most loved of all, at the location shown in the attached photo, near the kid's playground.


And now look at it: half-filled with building slurry and clay which covers the clean sandy bottom; bricks and other builders' rubbish strewn about; and an outlet pouring dirty water into it.


How typical. A huge ugly carbuncle crammed into what had been one of the nicest corners of the park, its real purpose to please a private interest: the dodgy 'academy' empire of Harris-the-Carpet-King. Large budget - nice little earner for the contractor. But for the people who actually own and use the park? Southwark Council isn't listening and couldn't care less. What we do get is the pathetic, everlasting Southwark War on Dogs.


Ask yourself how much Southwark has spent on this and the other large projects. In absolute contrast, any of these watering holes could be quickly, usefully and beautifully transformed - by steps and platforms down to the water, most of all - at the cost of a few worker-hours and a few hundred quid. At the least - AT THE VERY LEAST! - the mooks should have required the contractor to clean up after themselves there.


Ah yes, Neilcott the contractor. Did you see their fatuous, self-congratulatory sign? They follow the Code of Considerate Practice. They 'Care about Appearance'. They 'Respect the Community'. They 'Protect the Environment.' Hilarious! Well, easy to put a sign up. Box ticked, eh Neilcott?


What an absolute disgrace.


Lee Scoresby

That said, agree with Lee, pretty poor show to see bricks and what not discarded into that stream, whatever happened to

cracking down on anti social littering in the borough's nature and beauty spots, especially by a council funded contractor. Agree, disgraceful, why aren't the park wardens on top of this?

Oh dear, oh dear, Abe, I'm afraid your nasty agenda really leaks out like toxic waste. Where to start:


I did not make what would be a ridiculous claim that the park is only for dog owners.


Why try to set parents and dog owners against each other? Some people are both. It's bogus and highly insulting to imply, as you surely are, Abe, that the presence of dogs is somehow inimical to children being in the park. Making the stream more accessible would be good for supervised kids too - why not? (There are dozens of other nice, no- or low-cost improvements which could be made if, as I've posted before, it wasn't all in the hands of arrogant people who couldn't find Peckham Rye with a satnav.)


One trough is "more than adequate" - according to whom? You? Do you walk a dog Abe? I suspect not. 'More than' - you mean it's too much, Abe? They're spoiling us rotten, are they? Maybe it shouldn't be there at all?


Oh dear, Abe.


Sunbob, several issues there: Why could the kid's club not be in the conveniently central location it has been up until now, instead of up in one corner? Why for Southwark Parks Management is it all just about football? (I've posted on that - the answer is partly money, partly lifestyle cleansing.) Oh yes, footballers. Over years I've pointed out the carpets of trash these people leave, week in, week out, and Southwark's failure to deal with it.


But the real answer to a lot of this is Harris. That's why the building is where it is. Note to anyone reading this: keep an eye on so-called 'Grasslands East', the field in front of the new changing rooms. My suspicion - it's only that, and I'll be delighted if I'm wrong - is that in some redacted clause of some 'commercially confidential' agreement (hoho) Southwark has agreed to give Harris priority (maybe sometimes exclusive) use of that area.


Think this is unlikely? Why the late-night electrical works going on? What's to hide? What's the rush? The workmen have been told to say it's a powerpoint for 'eco' ice-cream vans . . . Yeah, right, lol. What I think is, it's a power point all right - for flood-lights, a sound system and all the paraphernalia of a sports event. And being installed at Harris's behest. Watch out for any sort of linear structure that could be used to fence off that area.


First mate, I don't think 'park wardens' exist. Over the years I've watched these bozos 'manage' this park, the arrangement even for so simple, repetitive a task as locking the gates has changed wildly, week by week. So: There are the nameless-faceless senior officers back at Southwark HQ. There are little chaps tapping away on their computers all day inside the park office. And there are the lycra stormtroopers, community whatevers, whizzing about, hassling dog owners rather a lot. No wardens that I can see. Proper park wardens? That'd be great.


LS

Lee, yes think you make good points. I have wondered for some time if the anti dog agenda was related in some way to slow encroachment of Harris onto PR. The new imminent PSPOS state that dogs will not be allowed into children's playing areas, so note your comment about Grasslands East and the 'possibility' of a long game with a view to acquisition of parts of PR?

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 1. Some people with children but not dogs also own

> and use the park

> 2. There is dog drinking trough by the public loos

> which is more than adequate provision.


Abe, in what way would it impose upon people with children but not dogs to ask the contractors not to dump their waste in the stream? I genuinely don't understand your first point.

the stream used to be clear and clean at that place - dogs really enjoyed the water especially since access is easier than at the bridges

it is one of the few places in the park where dogs don't have to compete with other park users, so a real pity that these contractors are using this as a dumping ground, possibly on account of it not being as visible as other parts of the park


are the park keepers taking any notice?

I texted the site manager and the park warden about the possible pollution of the stream

When it was discussed previously but no one responded.

Talking to one of the lovely gardeners - he thought it was nothing suspicious

Rather sand and chalk from within the soil.

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You implied he did a good job in your first paragraph when you said you would have hated to see Corbyn lead the country through Covid - the alternative being Johnson, presumably? With the results we all saw. Unite - you have a problem with unions? Who work hard to see that their members get a fair deal in their workplace? How exactly are these people and groups "all as bad as each other"? In what way? Labour "purging their party of the far-left" has given us a weak prime minister who has apparently deserted any "left" (aka caring for other people and having decent moral principles) leanings he ever had. Which is why people appear to be leaving Labour in droves and voting, or intending to vote, Green or Lib Dem or for an independent Left candidate. Starmer has shot himself in the foot, in my opinion. But what would I know. What worked?! I don't know enough about what you are talking about to comment, but "believing" you know the reason someone did something does not make it true. I don't believe that Corbyn ever got "starstruck" or "forgot about his politics", but if you can provide evidence that those things are true, then fair enough. I don't think you can, though.
    • I think you need to get a grip If it's who I am thinking of, she's a young black girl in her twenties, has braids with bright colours through them and - I suspect - works with her father. It's always the same man behind the wheel and he's older than her, always in the same van, so I'm assuming it's a father-daughter combo which, if it is, I think is rather sweet.  They hustle hard in a job that is poorly paid, has little prospects, is relentless and thankless. The fact that they have stuck it out since the pandemic says a lot about them.  I think she's a lovely girl, who's perhaps a little shy - but she'll smile or chat back if you make the effort with her. And I admire her for sticking with that job for so long. Perhaps she's just one of these people who's naturally a bit clumsy or bashes things, the same way some people are heavy on their feet when they walk. But I wouldn't dream of jeopardising her job because she closes the slams the gate and doesn't 'kiss' the ring doorbell with her fingers.  Perhaps she's being passive aggressive because you are. And perhaps she also wishes she got to spend her time worrying about potential damage to her letterbox or her gate.  As for your gate / letterbox - you're talking about hypotheticals. Has there been any damage? No. Then go and live your life and worry about it when it happens.  (apols we have the wrong person, but some of my points still stand). 
    • Greg did an amazing job! He built a cabinet in my living room and added shelving. A lovely guy and perfectionist who goes the extra mile. He really understands what you want and comes up with various options to meet your price range. Would highly recommend!
    • I love the fact that virtually everyone held their hands out when furlough payments were made yet can't equate massive debt with massive cash payments to keep the economy ticking over.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...