LadyDeliah Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 I find it all rather strange that no-one cared about the psychological issues of the shoe bomber, or the dude who had explosives in his underpants. They were just labelled as terrorists and thrown in prison.Why is everyone treating this blonde, blue eyed Christian terrorist any differently? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458246 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otta Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 Because there is a chance he could get out of prison at some stage, and that is wrong.Please don't imply that everyone is being racist and giving his an easier time because he's white, because that is bollocks.Perhaps the difference is that we all know Al Qaedas reasons for their attacks, whereas this one is something new, so people are more interested in the WHYS. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458251 Share on other sites More sharing options...
RosieH Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 All this talk of him getting out in 21 years. While that may be the maximum sentence, he can be kept in prison as long as he's a danger to the public, i.e. indefinitely. At least that's what it said on the Today programme, and I"m middle class enough for that to be my gospel. LadyD, Richard Reid was a member of al-Qaeda, a terrorist organisation, ergo a terrorist. I think Anders Behring has yet to be identified as anything other than a psychopath (albeit an extremist right-wing psychopath - oh, they said "psychopath" on the Today programme too). Much depends on your definition of terrorist, and as we've already discussed, while there isn't a universally accepted definition. Reports into the subject suggest membership of an organisation should be considered key defining something as terrorism. Otherwise, I guess the likes of Lee Harvey Oswald are also terrorists (and I'm no expert to say they're not, but they're not described as such). I just don't accept your implication of "blonde, blue-eyed".Edited because I was making little sense. Still probably making little sense. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458255 Share on other sites More sharing options...
red devil Posted July 26, 2011 Share Posted July 26, 2011 From The Indy...[quote name=The maximum custodial sentence for a crime in Norway is 21 years' date=' a figure that is testament to the country's sincere belief in rehabilitative punishment.However, if prison authorities believe someone still poses a threat to society they can extend the prison sentence every five years. Two psychiatrists have now been commissioned to assess Breivik's mental health. If he is declared insane he can be held indefinitely.]*throws the key away* Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458276 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magpie Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 This is very different to the two bombers - in both cases mentioned the perpertrators were suicide bombers - therefore they ultimately would not personally face the reality and impact of their actions. This is a guy who in cold blood (and pretty motiveless) shot some 70 teenagers, with apparently no remorse. No references to back this up, but apparently with most spree killers their kill rate slows down as they begin to process the reality of their actions - ie they begin to feel remorse - this guy just carried on. The biggest question for me is how he managed to keep going for so long before intervention, particularly so close to Oslo. I guess its as a result of lack of experience by the Norwegian Army/Police. I would like to think here that our own emergency services would be more rapid in their response, but who knows. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458402 Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_carnell Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Lady Deliah - Rosie and I disagreed with you on facebook about this and I'm going to have to again. Your accusations that there is some sort of institutional racism within the media that means that only "brown Muslims" (your words) get labelled as terrorists is simply innaccurate. See the IRA, Timothy McVeigh or the Soho nail bomber for example.I sympathise that tabloid coverage (esp. in the Sun) jumped the gun and instantly labelled these attacks as Al-Qaida related. This was clearly wrong.But I think getting fixated on semantics does nothing to help in this situation. It merely detracts from the atrocity. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458423 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeremy Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 It's like Otta says... I don't think anybody has sympathy for the guy, the only reason mental helath is being discussed is that it has a direct impact on the sentence. I'm sure that even the most liberal amongst us would like to see him removed from society for longer than 21 years. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458425 Share on other sites More sharing options...
mockney piers Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Funnily enough it was the opposite in Spain after the Madrid attacks. The government knew it would be damaging to them with impending elections, to have islamist terrorism as a result of hugely unpopular involvement in Iraq, so went to great lengths to insist it was good old ETA.The electorate told them what they thought of them a couple of weeks later.Agree you're way off the mark LD, well, maybe Glenn Beck might agree with you.Jeremy's right, the discussions about his sanity are because it looks like the work of someone who's insane.We've all seen these things on the news before, Hungerford, Dunblane and almost countless Columbine style shootings over the pond, and this one seems so very different firstly for the apparent political aspect, but more for lack of hallmark shootouts, suicides etc. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458426 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Medium Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 I wonder if anyone could be considered sane after murdering so many people in cold blood. I mean, why is there even a discussion? Because he's not wearing a strait jacket and a napoleon hat but a suit? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458429 Share on other sites More sharing options...
KidKruger Posted July 27, 2011 Share Posted July 27, 2011 Medium - because murder (single or mass), is in itself not proof of insanity.It's admittedly a convenient categorisation, but, I fear, not an automatic conclusion one can draw. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-458449 Share on other sites More sharing options...
HAL9000 Posted November 29, 2011 Share Posted November 29, 2011 Norway massacre: Breivik declared insaneParanoid schizophrenia, apparently: "The two psychiatrists who interviewed him on 13 occasions concluded that he lived in his 'own delusional universe where all his thoughts and acts are guided by his delusions', prosecutors told reporters." Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-504181 Share on other sites More sharing options...
KidKruger Posted November 29, 2011 Share Posted November 29, 2011 They'll need a conclusion like that to avoid having to release him in 20 years, which I think would be his right in Norway if not 'insane'. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-504190 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annette Curtain Posted November 29, 2011 Share Posted November 29, 2011 jim_the_chin Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> re: the insanity thing, could be deulsional> disorder: > > "false beliefs based on incorrect inference about> external reality that persist despite the evidence> to the contrary and these beliefs are not> ordinarily accepted by other members of the> person's culture or subculture"> > Not that it really matters much.Like BBW ? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-504237 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annette Curtain Posted November 29, 2011 Share Posted November 29, 2011 http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg190/scaled.php?server=190&filename=photo14kx.jpg&res=medium:-S Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-504238 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annette Curtain Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 Annette Curtain Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------Looky Likey ?Not sure Viking stationary had this guy in mind when putting their catalogue together.http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg190/scaled.php?server=190&filename=photo14kx.jpg&res=mediumhttp://www.hawkblocker.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Hawkblocker-Anders-Breivik-Lacoste.jpgI also see Lacoste are rather unsettled by Norway's notorious "mad-man" favouring their brand.Hey-ho-and-the merry-go-round-goes-round-and-round.NETTE Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-504531 Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Pibe Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 Trial has started. He sends shivers down the spine doesn't he.One thing, is it just me or does every photo of him look like he's had his face badly photoshopped on to a different head? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-538052 Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxxi Posted April 16, 2012 Share Posted April 16, 2012 El Pibe Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Trial has started. He sends shivers down the spine> doesn't he.> > One thing, is it just me or does every photo of> him look like he's had his face badly photoshopped> on to a different head?In his delusional fantasy he obviously sees himself as Bond villain Maximillian Largo...http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/87/Maximillian_Largo_by_Klaus_Maria_Brandauer.jpg... if prosecutors start calling him 'Number One' he will admit everything. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18593-norway/page/3/#findComment-538063 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now