Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Freddy1929 - Yes, very good theory about Burgess Park.


We really had a bumper start today - nearly two hours of a solid wall of sound from 6.00am onwards and I'm sure it won't stop until about 10.45 tonight.

Funny how a private company, that is there to make money, seems to have the right to inflict noise pollution on thousands on Londoners and get away with it. What does Southwark do about it? Do you think that I would get away with taking the silencer off my car exhaust and driving around Willy Walsh's house every two minutes, starting at dawn? Mind you it does start before dawn too; I remember being woken up by the sound of a Jumbo Jet at around 5.00am in February this year. Why don't they wake up passengers on those long-haul flights with the sound of jet engines, just like we have to put up with.

Oh, and by the way, before anyone says; "Why not move", A; it costs money, B; this is my family home for 31 years and, when I first moved here I go woken up by blackbirds singing - Virgin Atlantic, etc were'nt around and certainly no planes low flying like they are now.


Maybe we'll all run out of fuel soon and go by bike like Boris - Ha Ha Ha

Lol re. Burgess Park.


As usual we talk ourslves into believing things that aren't quite true. This red line is the number of flights per year at Heathrow:


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5f/London_Heathrow_Statistics.png/800px-London_Heathrow_Statistics.png


The change over the last decade is too small to be noticeable.


There will be a big uplift around the Olympics (maybe 10%?) but even that is probably too small to notice using our own subjective experience.


Aircraft movements at London City Airport are only 15% of Heathrow, with much smaller quieter planes, so this couldn't account for it.


I'm afraid it's probably just a case of 'good old days' syndrome.

Freddy, this friend of yours who was round yesterday, sounds like you two were having a bit of a mad one with your clipboards, infra-red measuring devices and stop watches.. Jealous...!


As for Burgess Park being turned into an international airport, what a brilliant idea. Burgess International (BGS). 'twill be very handy for those European mini-breaks.

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Freddy, this friend of yours who was round

> yesterday, sounds like you two were having a bit

> of a mad one with your clipboards, infra-red

> measuring devices and stop watches.. Jealous...!


Nevermind the noise from planes, I've recently moved to the area and the thought that the most interesting thing to do for 2 hours is time the buggers is seriously troubling.

Huguenot,



Many thanks for the graph (I notice that they have spent passengers wrong) - it DOES prove my point.


Flights to Heathrow have gone up by over 100,000/annum since I moved here in 1980, that's not including figures for 1980-85.


No wonder they're driving me nuts!


Fasten your seat belts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...