Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oi Meds, your thread on Less is More has just been

> nominated by me as a piece of unpolished turd.

>

> Get in here.


I already nominated him for that Frank and he ignored it - this makes the whole naughty room null and void and you can leave now.


(the key is under the dead cat by the window)

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Frankito Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oi Meds, your thread on Less is More has just

> been

> > nominated by me as a piece of unpolished turd.

> >

> > Get in here.

>

> I already nominated him for that Frank and he

> ignored it - this makes the whole naughty room

> null and void and you can leave now.

>

> (the key is under the dead cat by the window)


maxxi, no one seconded your proposal thus I didn't ignore it. So the Naughty Room is still very valid. Fancy a stay?

The 75/75 rule was originally proposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an alternative means of testing the bioequivalence of two formulations of a pharmaceutical agent. The rule specified that the ratio of test-to-reference formulation of a bioavailability measure arising in a bioequivalence study must be between 75 and 125 per cent of unity in at least 75 per cent of subjects to declare two formulations bioequivalent.


Eat that. ;-)

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I said 73 first

>

> I seconded Maxxi so what next..?


You're obviously NOT going stir crazy given your droppings are all over the place like that of an unwanted mouse, so what are you talking about?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Is Gigi spayed & microchipped?
    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...