Jump to content

The Naughty Room


Alan Medic

Recommended Posts

This is where you can nominate someone for starting a thread that is too silly for your liking or just simply annoys you. The nomination has to be seconded and when it is the poster shall have a self imposed 24 hour ban from posting. Of course they might ignore this but we'll deal with that when it happens.


Anyone, I'd like to nominate Karter for his Pizza thread. Just how many threads about sauces does this forum need? Admittedly Karter it could have been any one of a number. You just got unlucky. Too many silly threads relegate some could be interesting ones to obscurity before their time.


Anyone second this nomination?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cannot believe that the creator of the thread-muddying, OP-distracting, train-of-thought-destroying, LM pleasing and logic-defying 73 game has posted here.


I realise that 'Less is More' has probably been on your mind for a while Doc but to start that doomed thread with the frankly 'Micklewrightian' "Okay guys?" and leave it at that is, quite apart from being simply lazy, the sort of itch that, once scratched, leaves a blemish that stains the page and does to other threads exactly what you accuse others of here - Too many silly threads relegate some could be interesting ones to obscurity before their time.


J'accuse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maxxi, you are nominating me for a different thread so I'm not gone yet. This thread could herald the dawn of a new self governing era for public forums like this. Think about it. No more silly mods pushing their weight about once they get the sniff of a little authority. Power to the people! Don't knock it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd like to nominate Frankie for starting a thread

> about something keeping him awake. One that was

> sooooo uninteresting that no one even posted

> there. Anyone second that?



I second that


( I haven't even read it )


* goes to read post *

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Netts, totally unimpressed by that killer vote..


And Dad, this just isn't fair.... This is victimisation just cos I love a bit of foie gras and complained about some nouse ffs...


Can I post on here my comments on other threads?


How long is incarceration? Am I done yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im so disappointed...... somehow i thought the 'Naughty Room' might be in someones basement with chains on the walls and mirrors on the ceiling. Was sort of hoping for an invite.

Ill get back on my naughty step for thinking such things happen in East Dulwich. Sorry.:-$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can I talk about you?


Are you open to bribes? Working in accounts, aren't they all....?


On a serious note, your new theead, you MUST blow the whistle or at least present the evidence to an impartial third party, you wouldn't want to be scape-goated. And if you are leaving what have you to lose. Morally, well, it's quite obvious...


Let me out now as that was bloody good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well worth signing up to become a "supporter" as they send their updates and often shed light on things the council and their supporters would rather didn't get too much attention! https://www.onedulwich.uk/get-involved
    • Spot on...and they rant against "anonymous" groups like One Dulwich and then post missives from "anonymous" lobby groups like Clean Air Dulwich without any sense of hypocrisy or irony...
    • The original council proposals for the area around the Dulwich cross roads were made well before Covid - and were rejected then by locals. The council used the Covid legislation to push through the LTNs when opposition was not allowed. LTNs, as experiments were some good (reduced traffic in areas which did not push traffic elsewhere and which did meet the needs of residents - typically in places very well served by public transport and where the topology (absence e.g. of hills) allowed wide use of cycling and walking - not as it happens a good description of the Dulwich (inc ED, WD and ND) areas.)  Dulwich never met Southwark's own description of ideal LTN areas, but did happen to match Southwark Councillor ambitions dating way back. One Dulwich has been clear, I believe that it is anti this LTN but not, necessarily all LTNs per se. But as it is One Dulwich is has not stated views about LTNs in general. In the main those prepared to make a view known, in Dulwich, have not supported the Council's LTN ambitions locally - whilst some, living in the LTN area, have gained personal benefit. But it would appear not even a majority of those living in the LTN area have supported the LTN. And certainly not those living immediately outside the area where traffic has worsened. As a resident of Underhill, a remaining access route to the South Circular, I can confirm that I am suffering increased traffic and blockages in rush hours whilst living some way away from the LTN. All this - 'I want to name the guilty parties' -' is One Dulwich a secret fascists cabal whose only interest is being anti-Labour?' conspiracy theorising is frankly irrelevant - whoever they are they seem to represent feelings of a majority of actual residents either in the LTNs, or in parts of Dulwich impacted by the LTNs. And I'm beginning to find these 'Answer me this...' tirades frankly irritating.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...