Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oi Meds, your thread on Less is More has just been

> nominated by me as a piece of unpolished turd.

>

> Get in here.


I already nominated him for that Frank and he ignored it - this makes the whole naughty room null and void and you can leave now.


(the key is under the dead cat by the window)

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Frankito Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oi Meds, your thread on Less is More has just

> been

> > nominated by me as a piece of unpolished turd.

> >

> > Get in here.

>

> I already nominated him for that Frank and he

> ignored it - this makes the whole naughty room

> null and void and you can leave now.

>

> (the key is under the dead cat by the window)


maxxi, no one seconded your proposal thus I didn't ignore it. So the Naughty Room is still very valid. Fancy a stay?

The 75/75 rule was originally proposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an alternative means of testing the bioequivalence of two formulations of a pharmaceutical agent. The rule specified that the ratio of test-to-reference formulation of a bioavailability measure arising in a bioequivalence study must be between 75 and 125 per cent of unity in at least 75 per cent of subjects to declare two formulations bioequivalent.


Eat that. ;-)

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I said 73 first

>

> I seconded Maxxi so what next..?


You're obviously NOT going stir crazy given your droppings are all over the place like that of an unwanted mouse, so what are you talking about?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi Merry Christmas no joy with that Paul Hackett email thanks 
    • Miss Robson is the last of the old school independent vets. All the chains are have seriously hiked their prices over the last few years which now makes pet ownership only possible for the wealthy few. Even with pet insurance -( which often excludes items or has ‘deductibles’ ) it is just so much money. A visit with some medication is often £150 - £200. The vets themselves are excellent. 
    • Awful. A Google search came up with this, but will he check his office email over Christmas? Maybe worth also contacting local councillor? 'To contact Southern Housing's CEO, Paul Hackett, you can try his direct email, [email protected], or use the general contact email [email protected], as well as calling their main number, 0300 303 1066, for general inquiries or to be directed to the executive level.' Also, from the website: https://www.southernhousing.org.uk/latest-news/2025/contacting-us-over-the-festive-period   'Contacting us about an emergency? If you have an emergency outside of the above times over the festive period, such as severe flooding, an uncontainable leak, gas leak, complete electrical failure or lift breakdown, please call us on 0300 303 1066' I hope it is sorted out soon.
    • Dawson Heights again  2 lifts out of order at ladlands block Christmas Eve so of course the 🛗 will not be repaired tomorrow Christmas Day or Boxing Day or when how do elderly or mothers with children and prams and food and presents get to the floors and with the 10 minutes you get to drop off  to park and not get a Pcn fine and delivery food to relatives who can’t leave their house unbelievable Southern housing does any know email address of Coe of southern housing 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...