Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oi Meds, your thread on Less is More has just been

> nominated by me as a piece of unpolished turd.

>

> Get in here.


I already nominated him for that Frank and he ignored it - this makes the whole naughty room null and void and you can leave now.


(the key is under the dead cat by the window)

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Frankito Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oi Meds, your thread on Less is More has just

> been

> > nominated by me as a piece of unpolished turd.

> >

> > Get in here.

>

> I already nominated him for that Frank and he

> ignored it - this makes the whole naughty room

> null and void and you can leave now.

>

> (the key is under the dead cat by the window)


maxxi, no one seconded your proposal thus I didn't ignore it. So the Naughty Room is still very valid. Fancy a stay?

The 75/75 rule was originally proposed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an alternative means of testing the bioequivalence of two formulations of a pharmaceutical agent. The rule specified that the ratio of test-to-reference formulation of a bioavailability measure arising in a bioequivalence study must be between 75 and 125 per cent of unity in at least 75 per cent of subjects to declare two formulations bioequivalent.


Eat that. ;-)

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I said 73 first

>

> I seconded Maxxi so what next..?


You're obviously NOT going stir crazy given your droppings are all over the place like that of an unwanted mouse, so what are you talking about?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...