Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's purely cosmetic. No excuses, sit down,

> leaving is not an option. Meds is off swimming

> with some friends and has left me in charge.


F that Frankie. You've watched the Cuckoo's Nest too many times. Now sit down in the corner or I will UP your dosage.

Frankie, you're free to go........................Frankie........FRANKIE


Oh numbers you've turned up. Heard you had technical problems. Forgot how to turn on your computer after another night on the piss. Glad to see you've sobered up. Anyway, nominations have to be seconded so you wont be seeing me stuck in here all day thanks.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh numbers you've turned up. Heard you had

> technical problems.


You heard wrong then, please don't believe the assumptions of others. Yes, my laptop is fucked but I can still go online.


Forgot how to turn on your

> computer after another night on the piss. Glad to

> see you've sobered up. Anyway, nominations have to

> be seconded so you wont be seeing me stuck in here

> all day thanks.


WTF! I hope to god I won't be so bored that I spend all today reading this, quite frankly, crummy thread.

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oi Meds, I left yesterday on a technicality.

>

> You should stick around as I am seconding

> K-numeritos on your nomination. Enjoy >:D<


What technicality Frankie? You just left. What did I tell you about using that vulgar non smiley?

Oh here we go again, another Dad ticking off...


Can't remember what you 'told' me and precisely for that reason, I chose to forget it...


It's my naughty smiley and I will use it as I please.


Seeing as this is the naughty room, it seems very appropriate... And I can't help myself: >:D<

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Memo to self: Must step up security on this thread

> ASAP.

>

> BTW maxxi, did you use a silver hammer?



Step it up if you like but you will be playing into my hands, you can, after all and ultimately, only go to one level of security - MAXXIMUM (and she tells me everythingB))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...