Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Following on from a debate in the Drawing Room regarding the difficulties in the US on it's ability to meet it's debt obligations....


Can a left wing or socialist minded government ever solve a finanical crisis or get a country out of a recession - Is there much precedent for this ?


Or is there more precedent for a left wing government taking the tax and spend approach that leads to increasing debt.

It's difficult for a party that's so reliant on state employees and unions for its funding and support to do this as


a) Labour found out in the 70s

b) and is probably why some more strategic minded Labour politicians are secretly plaesed they are not in power when such painful and neccessary cuts to public spending are being made


Critics might argue thats this bit (below) is an assumption rather than proved but I tend to agree


Or is there more precedent for a left wing government taking the tax and spend approach that leads to increasing debt.

It could be argued that Roosevelt's left wing govt in the 30s pulled the US out of the Depression, though modern economists tend to say it was the war. But generally, my personal view is that left wing governemnts are generally terrible at economics becuase they are all about romance and nothing about ptracticality.

Does any government actually have wings


I mean IF it/they did surely a left & a right would be best


Otherwise one wing of either would cause it/them to fly round in opposite circles


Maybe that's part of the actual problem, no?


NETTE:-S

This is an interesting political map... (sorry I had to break the page, but when I shrank it, it wasn't legible).


http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/maps_and_graphs/2011/7/22/1311335535423/Information-is-Beautiful--001.jpg


I can see where some of our more strident pundits fall on this ;-)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Following on from a debate in the Drawing Room

> regarding the difficulties in the US on it's

> ability to meet it's debt obligations....

>

> Can a left wing or socialist minded government

> ever solve a finanical crisis or get a country out

> of a recession - Is there much precedent for this

> ?


No.


> Or is there more precedent for a left wing

> government taking the tax and spend approach that

> leads to increasing debt.


Yes.

katienumbers' opinion is typical of poorly informed right-wing tub thumping. It's wrong and it fcuks nations up.


The biggest recessions in history have been solved by left wing governments.


The Great Depression in the US was caused by right wing US governments.


This is what right wing governments did to the US in the 20s:


By the end of the decade, the bottom 80 percent of all income-earners will be removed from the tax rolls completely. Taxes on the rich will fall throughout the decade.


By 1929, the richest 1 percent will own 40 percent of the nation's wealth. The bottom 93 percent will have experienced a 4 percent drop in real disposable per-capita income between 1923 and 1929.


Individual worker productivity rises an astonishing 43 percent from 1919 to 1929. But the rewards are being funneled to the top: the number of people reporting half-million dollar incomes grows from 156 to 1,489 between 1920 and 1929, a phenomenal rise compared to other decades. But that is still less than 1 percent of all income-earners.


The Great Depression wasn't alleviated until the election of Roosevelt in 1933, a left winger whose belief in the redistribution of wealth was so frightening to the right wing establishment that they actually planned a military coup!!!

It's so easy for you to start rolling out the insults when the truth hurts.


Don't expect a right winger to pay any attention to truth at all katienumbers. Goes the same place as climate change denial eh? ;-)


Anyway here's national debt by government colour. It's as clear as you like that there is no correlation between 'debt' and the political colour of the government.


file.php?20,file=30797


Both types of government increase and decrease debt. It's driven by world events and macro economic events, not by petty issues like social conscience.


To cross tab that with recessions:


1919-21 cuts in government spending (post war)

1930-31 cuts in government spending (right wing policies)

1973-75 oil crisis

1980-82 caused by monetarist policies

1990-92 caused by lack of management and regulation of financial markets (savings and loan)

2008-09 caused by lack of management and regulation of financial markets (leveraging and bad debt)


So I think it would be fair to say that 5 out of the last 6 recessions were caused by right wing policies.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Anyway here's national debt by government colour.



Please Sir...


* puts hand up *


What team is the Purple one on your picture & the Pink one for that matter.



Is it the Purple on that keeps sinking us ?


( doesn't Purple sound like a lot like Papal, funnily ? )



NETTE:-$

There's plenty of people who don't fit into that stupid (and US politics) map Hugenot, plenty...although interesting many of those on the 'left' and progressive side of it seem to think anyone who qusetion them fit in the far blue/right by default as I find out day after day on here. People who don't think for themselves just like to put poeple in their easy label boxes.....you know, using terms like 'Guardian Readers, 'Liberals' etc ;-)

I don't quite get what you're saying there acm? This seems to show that the US is the same as the UK in the sense that the 'colour' of the government has no correlation with debt.


Please note that in the US the colours are reversed to the UK. In the US right wing is red, and left wing is blue (the terms right and left here are comparative not absolute).


Quids, the arch proponent of lazy stereotypes is complaining about being 'put in a box'. Ha ha :)) I'm so relieved you can see the irony!


I should imagine that nobody fits precisely into 'that stupid map' just as nobody fits into 'stupid' stereotypes of Guardianista bourgeoisie or lazy Greek spongers.


I can't see how any sane person would try and say that people were so clear cut?


I'm certainly not putting anyone into easy boxes, I can see how despite my generally left wing social leanings I also have a lot of right wing characteristics.


Please feel free to use the 'map' as intended - for a bit of light-hearted fun and self-analysis ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sure, ChatGPT never ceases to amaze.
    • Chatgpt is a joy (and scary)  No Water on Barry Road" (to the tune of No Woman, No Cry) (Verse 1) No water… on Barry Road No water… on Barry Road Said, I remember, when we used to flow In the tap by the old front gate Oba served us clear, sweet water Then it vanished like fate And then the plumber would come in the evening Fixing pipes, sayin’, "Just hold tight" But every time we checked the faucet It was still a dusty fight (Chorus) No water… (no water) On Barry Road (on Barry Road) No water… yeah On Barry Road (Verse 2) I see the buckets lined up outside Hope in every pail we hold The sun be blazing, the kids be crying And the kettle’s running cold Good friends we had, and good friends we lost To the drought along the way In this bright future, we can't forget the past But we sure need water today (Chorus) No water… no flowin’ tide On Barry Road… we stand and sigh No water… but we still survive On Barry Road… we still try (Bridge) Oh, dry days will pass, I know Pipe dreams gotta start to flow But until then we wait and pray For rain or trucks to come our way (Final Chorus) No water… (no water) On Barry Road (on Barry Road) No water… no pride But still we rise… (It refused to sing it for me) 
    • Hubby had to retire from work due to serious ill health which had meant he was off work for several months at a time. His hospital consultant advised part time employment only, Signed on at Job Centre and asked them to send him on courses, especially IT has not computer literate or had a computer. Job Centre refused and insisted he applied for full time work even though he produced medical evidence from hospital and letter from previous employment detailing the reason why had medically retired him. He applied for the (then) disability allowance but was refused as not disabled enough and the fact he could work part time. Applied f or several part time jobs but when they knew of his medical history turned him down. That was 18 years ago. Disabled people who want  to work find it hard to find employment. I studied Disability and Employment in Holland as part of my degree and found at that time, the Dutch system more flexible. If a disabled person found a job part time, they still received a portion of their benefit as well as wages. If found a full time position, benefit suspended and were subject to regular reviews as to how they performed in  the job. If there were no problems, benefit was withdrawn, however if they found the work was not suited to their disability - they gave up work and went straight back to receiving their full benefit. If a disabled person finds employment, their benefits stop immediately. If they cannot maintain the work and are sacked, getting back onto benefits is very difficult, Give those who are able to work at least part time, the opportunity to have reduced benefits to top up wages.
    • Trickle of cold water this morning, but by 3 pm we have both hot and cold water with normal pressure, Hopefully this will continue.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...