Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What on earth is this problem about the SDR now?

>

> It was invented in 1969 FFS.

>

> It's just a way for credit worthy governments to

> support their spending/debts if the banks go tits

> up. They borrow off eahc other instead of the

> banks. It's not rocket science.

>

> If you want to understand what this means just

> remember that 40% of UK annual government spending

> is borrrowed. If we can't borrow it we're all

> fecked.

>

> SDR covers our arses.


When the SDR replaces the dollar - what banks and finical institutions are going to take an haircut on their holding?, None.


The system will try inflate its way out of the black-hole of debt that the world is in, and that means average Joe & Jane paying the price.


I like to draw your attention again to the Minsky Moment.

Debt can no longer be rolled into the future.

Please just calm down - you seem to have no sense of proportion.


Everything for you is black or white, dollar or disaster.


I can assure you that we'll still have debt tomorrow, and still have debt the day after.


We've already had several 'Minsky Moments' and we're still here. If you haven't noticed the stock exchanges are all down 35% over three years ago.


We're all still here.


You're just too young NN, we've been through boom and bust so many times it's laughable. It's not the end of the world.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> If you want to understand what this means just

> remember that 40% of UK annual government spending

> is borrrowed. If we can't borrow it we're all

> fecked.

>

H, grateful if you could further explain your figure of 40% please? It doesn't make sense to me.

I'm not sure what you don't understand UDT?


Borrowing is the difference between what you spend and your receipts.


The last figures I quoted were for November 2010: total govt. expenditure ?53.9bn, borrowing was ?22.77bn - 42.2%


Of that ?53.9bn interest costs were ?4.5bn, so a quarter of what we were borrowing was to pay interest on what we borrowed before. This is credit card junkie stuff.


I quoted it a few months ago, I hope you don't mind me using the same figure as an illustration?


I could have updated it, but I was simply trying to illustrate a point.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...