Jump to content

Petition to allow only those who pass the "I'm not an idiotic cunt" test to post on the forum


Recommended Posts

Yeah I have often thought that some sort of entitlement testing should be applied more broadly in society.


For example, a simple common sense multiple choice test with a low (e.g. 3/10) pass mark attached to votes in an election for them to be valid...


But this forum? The lifeblood of this forum is people who make twatish points and then the inevitable backlash that follows... Are you trying to get this thing closed down?

Wot qualifies as an idiotic @#$%&" ? Who makes such a judgment? Compared to who?

hmmm not seeing the sense of it on a public forum.


Next you'll be suggesting segregation on the buses (old and less abled people upstairs, toddlers at the back hanging off the chairs, ED snobs at the front, cyclists allowed onboard in the what was wheelchair/buggy priority area etc).


Wotever!

Senor Chevalier Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah I have often thought that some sort of

> entitlement testing should be applied more broadly

> in society.

>

> For example, a simple common sense multiple choice

> test with a low (e.g. 3/10) pass mark attached to

> votes in an election for them to be valid...

>


a simple common sense multiple choice test ???


That would elliminate most of the MP's that Run err. (Ruin) this Country..

Let's get rid of all the idiotic fucks.


Then get rid of the self-important, worthy fucks.


And the patronising fucks who think they're more clever than everyone else.


And the annoying, trolling fucks - and anyone who posts "in character".





How many posters will we have left?

Falling Down DVD - pressed when DVD was new and exciting but lot's of films (especially Warner Brothers films) were basically copied from a VHS cassete taped off the TV


I exaggerate, but not by much.

I now pretty now much assume that every new poster with strong views is some sort of comedy/anarchic character thought up to pass the time (richardbach and kid for example?). It's gone from merely annoying to a right PITA - crushed and devalued cannot be far off, I tell you.

Amok, of course, being a city which exists in a dimension perpendicular to ours. Its municipal administration relies critically on the skimming off of the hypothetical energy released by the infinite potential for annoyance causing bollicks which hums and throbs around our online world.


Although it?s a bit of a stretch to expect people to get such tenuous references Mockney.

aww shucks


the daily mash (sorry strafer) nicely summed it up

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/riots-caused-by-society-or-lazy%2c-thieving-pricks%2c-say-experts-201108094174/


"Meanwhile, as former England cricket captain Alec Stewart began assembling a posse of vigilante test heroes, seismologists reported a sudden lurch to the right as people who own tagines found themselves calling for the immediate deployment of the Parachute Regiment and a couple of RAF Tornadoes."

Tagines! Ooooh good. Now they've been properly mocked I can expect to pick one up in the charity shop cheaply as the ambivalent warriors worriers of SE22 get rid in droves (got a chicken brick a while back for pennies after the M&S/Waitrose bloodbath!).


*Searches for foie gras with pomegranate recipe*

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're safe Frankie - I don't have that power.

>

> I only have the power of the crossbow.

>

> Oops sorry, meant to say, that of course you

> wouldn't be on the list anyway.


Hmm... somebody else after cheap cat litter. It's not WHAT you know on this bloody forum...!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A vet might be able to trace its owners if it's chipped. Also I believe twb who posts on here has a mobile scanner. Poor cat.
    • If you look at the application linked to in the OP, you'll see it's a Licensing Act 2003 one, in this case for the purposes of sale by retail of alcohol and for the provision of late night refreshment: "TAKEAWAY COFFEE/ HOT SNACKS 2300-0100". IF the shop counts as a Hot Food Takeaway, then section 48 of the Southwark Plan https://www.southwark.gov.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Southwark Plan 2022 reduced 1.pdf , which appears to be the latest one linked to on Southwark's site, will I presume be applied in any  planning application (Is there one?). It says: "New hot food takeaways will only be permitted where: ..... 3. The proposed location is further than 400 metres from any existing or proposed primary or secondary school’s boundary; ....." It incorporates  policy laid down in the National Planning Policy Framework, and thence the London Plan.  Over the years KFC, and others, have taken a  number of appeals against local planning authority decisions on Takeaways to the Planning Inspectorate.  Some have been allowed.  KFCs 'commentary on evidence contained in London Plan Topic Paper: Hot Food Takeaways', https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/nlp_ad_91.pdf may be of interest to some. I'm guessing it's referring to https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_topic_paper_on_hot_food_takeaways.pdf of 2018, but haven't yet checked.  
    • This might be an option?    https://www.southwark.gov.uk/southwark-presents/coding-and-robotics-workshop-peckham-library-0
    • does anyone know of a missing tabby cat? I’m afraid we have just found a body in our front garden on Barry rd. not traumatised, looks like it’s asleep
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...