Jump to content

Petition to allow only those who pass the "I'm not an idiotic cunt" test to post on the forum


Recommended Posts

Yeah I have often thought that some sort of entitlement testing should be applied more broadly in society.


For example, a simple common sense multiple choice test with a low (e.g. 3/10) pass mark attached to votes in an election for them to be valid...


But this forum? The lifeblood of this forum is people who make twatish points and then the inevitable backlash that follows... Are you trying to get this thing closed down?

Wot qualifies as an idiotic @#$%&" ? Who makes such a judgment? Compared to who?

hmmm not seeing the sense of it on a public forum.


Next you'll be suggesting segregation on the buses (old and less abled people upstairs, toddlers at the back hanging off the chairs, ED snobs at the front, cyclists allowed onboard in the what was wheelchair/buggy priority area etc).


Wotever!

Senor Chevalier Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah I have often thought that some sort of

> entitlement testing should be applied more broadly

> in society.

>

> For example, a simple common sense multiple choice

> test with a low (e.g. 3/10) pass mark attached to

> votes in an election for them to be valid...

>


a simple common sense multiple choice test ???


That would elliminate most of the MP's that Run err. (Ruin) this Country..

Let's get rid of all the idiotic fucks.


Then get rid of the self-important, worthy fucks.


And the patronising fucks who think they're more clever than everyone else.


And the annoying, trolling fucks - and anyone who posts "in character".





How many posters will we have left?

Falling Down DVD - pressed when DVD was new and exciting but lot's of films (especially Warner Brothers films) were basically copied from a VHS cassete taped off the TV


I exaggerate, but not by much.

I now pretty now much assume that every new poster with strong views is some sort of comedy/anarchic character thought up to pass the time (richardbach and kid for example?). It's gone from merely annoying to a right PITA - crushed and devalued cannot be far off, I tell you.

Amok, of course, being a city which exists in a dimension perpendicular to ours. Its municipal administration relies critically on the skimming off of the hypothetical energy released by the infinite potential for annoyance causing bollicks which hums and throbs around our online world.


Although it?s a bit of a stretch to expect people to get such tenuous references Mockney.

aww shucks


the daily mash (sorry strafer) nicely summed it up

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/riots-caused-by-society-or-lazy%2c-thieving-pricks%2c-say-experts-201108094174/


"Meanwhile, as former England cricket captain Alec Stewart began assembling a posse of vigilante test heroes, seismologists reported a sudden lurch to the right as people who own tagines found themselves calling for the immediate deployment of the Parachute Regiment and a couple of RAF Tornadoes."

Tagines! Ooooh good. Now they've been properly mocked I can expect to pick one up in the charity shop cheaply as the ambivalent warriors worriers of SE22 get rid in droves (got a chicken brick a while back for pennies after the M&S/Waitrose bloodbath!).


*Searches for foie gras with pomegranate recipe*

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're safe Frankie - I don't have that power.

>

> I only have the power of the crossbow.

>

> Oops sorry, meant to say, that of course you

> wouldn't be on the list anyway.


Hmm... somebody else after cheap cat litter. It's not WHAT you know on this bloody forum...!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
    • So what do people want?  More housing.  More affordable housing.  But not in my back yard. That applies to urban areas too.  Easy to criticise, but where are your answers?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...