Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stan Collymore view is quite interesting.


My view is that Liverpool have no moral values. After all, last January they spent ?60m on two players, one accused of assaulting a woman and the other known for cannibalism on the pitch.



edit to remove a double negative.

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

No I've never been racially abused, and I never said that because he didn't react, it couldn't have happened. Again with the putting words in my mouth.


Zidane was a pro too by the way.


I think the only thing that is clear is that UDT doesn't like Liverpool, and so will spout any old shite about them.


Like I've said several times, IF there is any evidence of wrongdoing, he should be punished. Until that happens, most sane people won't be convinced of his guilt just because they don't like his club.

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No I've never been racially abused, and I never

> said that because he didn't react, it couldn't

> have happened. Again with the putting words in my

> mouth.

>

> Zidane was a pro too by the way.

>

> I think the only thing that is clear is that UDT

> doesn't like Liverpool, and so will spout any old

> shite about them.

>

> Like I've said several times, IF there is any

> evidence of wrongdoing, he should be punished.

> Until that happens, most sane people won't be

> convinced of his guilt just because they don't

> like his club.


Otta, your statements seems to be getting more ridiculous as time goes by. I've never said I hated Liverpool or any other clubs for that matter. All I did was merely pointed out Liverpool's moral position when it comes to buying players.


Zidane acted unprofessionally during the World Cup final game against Italy. Are you seriously saying he acted entirely professionally in the sending off incident?

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

I wasn't aware any morality existed nowadays in the world of transfers or football for that matter. If a player is important enough to a club they will overlook just about anything so long as it doesn't interfere with his ability to play.


Off the top of my head I can remember MU sacking Tommy Doc for having being caught having an affair with the wife of another employee. You could say that was a moral stance. Anyone think of other examples?

Undisputedtruth

Undisputedtruth

Posted
Posted

AM,


Glen Hoddle and Terry Venables as England managers. Their sackings were totally unrelated to football. Terry Venables had technically resigned his position but there were question marks about his business interests though.


Also, Mutu sacked by Chelsea for taking drugs.

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry Otta but reading all of your posts on this

> subject it springs to mind that either you haven't

> properly researched the subject or have a poor

> grasp of logic.



Okay then. I'll be sure to do more research about the allegation. Clearly I'm missing the evidence that proves Suarez guilty.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Capello dropping fine specimen of a man Terry as

> Eng captain for knobbing his (Terry's) mate's

> missus.



At the other end of the spectrum, Arsenal supporting Tony Adams after his prison sentence for drink driving, and Paul Merson after admitting his addictions to drink, drugs, and gambling. Oh and Paul Davis after breaking an opponents jaw.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted
If memory serves me correctly Patrick Vieira accused Neil Ruddock of racism a few years back, during a rather unpleasant exchange which saw Vieira spitting at "Razor"? Ian Wright also famously accused Peter schmeichel of racism during a typically friendly encounter.
Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well it seems Evra have lifted the lid on racism

> in football as clearly these incidences have been

> happening for many years. The Paul Davis broken

> jaw incident was related to racial abuse.



Really?? I thought it was because the opponent had raked the back of his ankle, or part of his leg, with his studs??

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well in those days you were allowed to do a man's

> tackle but I've always thought the Paul Davis'

> incident was related to racial abuse and about his

> mother. I'll bet Glenn Cockeril kept his mouth

> shut during the rest of his career.



Well he certainly had problems fot at least two months after Davis walloped him!! ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • alice
      Oh Rachel....

      By alice · Posted

      That the leaders of our country are wealthy people comes as a shock to you? How ridiculous.  Why shouldn’t they be living in those houses?  
    • Loutwo
      Oh Rachel....

      By Loutwo · Posted

      No such thing as a “witch hunt” against a taxpayer funded public figure. Especially someone in charge of finances.    It is the responsibility of a landlord to ensure the agent acting on their behalf has done everything required to validate a tenancy. And to double check that too. Stop justifying it as some sort of ‘oversight’ purely down to the agent.    Also, I’d question the socialist credentials of a Labour chancellor owning a beautiful detached house on a private estate close to the edge of Dulwich Village. Great Brownings, according to some media outlets. What a s**tshow.    Louisa.    https://southwarknews.co.uk/area/dulwich/southwark-faces-calls-to-take-action-against-chancellor-rachel-reeves-who-is-accused-of-breaking-housing-rules-when-renting-out-dulwich-home/
    • Hen123
      Oh Rachel....

      By Hen123 · Posted

      Was the property in one the wards Southwark added last November? It would be a bit harsh if it was and Southwark didn’t notify residents and landlords. 
    • HeadNun
      Oh Rachel....

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Yes it's a witch hunt, but that's what the press does. Optics are almost more important than policy these days. If the public has even a whiff that a government isn't trustworthy, or is chaotic, that feeling lingers like a rotten smell.  It's another comms catastrophe for Labour - every time there's a story they rush out a knee-jerk denial, without verifying the facts. They did it with Raynor and it was a shit-show. That's what Labour keeps getting wrong. Reeves should have been gagged and told by someone with an ounce of sense to first check her emails. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...