Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remember Anders Limpar? introduced a new level of

> diving to England.


Try to drag yourself into the 21st century. If you want to go that route lets add Michael "benchwarmer" Owen, and Stevie G.


Henderson- ?20 million, Carroll- ?35 million, Downing- ?20 million, their faces when ?2.75 million Van Persie takes all 3 points: Priceless. Anyone gonna start asking the court jester AKA "King " Kenny how come his his expensive signings can't find their backsides with both hands never mind the back of the net? Spuds, only 4 points now - mind the gap.

Otta, 'every team has players who do it', care to name names/teams? there is the odd player who might look to take advantage of a shoulder barge, this is not to be compared with certain players who look to cheat at any given opportunity, witness Suarez. apples with pears.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Be fair though PD, you can't honestly claim that

> no one in an Arsenal shirt has ever taken a dive!

> Every team has players who do it, so it's a bit

> much going on about it, particularly when you've

> won the 2 matches, and no specific dive has really

> done you any damage.


Bales swan dive with half pike and triple twist could have ended up having our keeper sent off and as for Suarez, don't get me started with him.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And yet he wasn't sent off, and you won both

> matches.

>

> Atticus, pop over to YouTube, search for Football

> Dives, and you'll get loads and loads of players

> from loads and loads of teams.


Neither here nor there, still a diving cheating twat and shouldn't do it. THAT'S the point.

Everton fan thinks Liverpool are the worst club for diving. Wow, what a totally unpredictable shock, I can hardly believe it.


btw name an everton diver?




(I distance myself from calling fans and players scum by the way)


Leon Osman


Tim Hibbert


I'm not trying to say that it's rife at Everton, but don't try to tell me that the fine gents who don the blue shirt are somehow above taking a dive.


I admit that Liverpool players have dived, but trying to suggest that it's some sort of ingrained part of the football club is just biased nonsense, but not surprising.


This little Hall of shame would suggest Spurs are pretty bad for it, but I wouldn't call Spurs a team of divers. And hang on, is that an Everton player I see in that list??? Surely not, as Everton players DO NOT DIVE!!!


And PD, surely no Arsenal player would ever take a dive?!?!?!?


Oh hang on.


And there's more



I hate pasting all this stuff, as I have not moaned about other teams diving, and as I said, I wish no Liverpool player would dive. But, for anyone to come opn here and try to say that their team would never do a thing like that, well, that's just bul!shit.

My "Google Skills" that have so impressed you involved going to google and typing "Everton player dives". Believe me, I didn't have to dig deep.


And no, I don't think ",diver" when I think Osman, my point was simply that it happens.


You, as ever, just want to paint Liverpool as the baddies. Whatever makes you happy man.


Christ, you must have wet your pants when Stephane Henchoz's hand blocked an Arsenal shot in the 2001 cup final.

Oh bugger! Thought Spurs played quite well today and then Man U get three chances and stick them all away. That's football. I can't remember the last time we beat Man Utd. Maybe Red Devil can enlighten me on that one. I knew we'd lose today by the way.


PS: I've never ever ever seen an Arsenal player dive or cheat in anyway whatsoever. They are so honest those Gooners. They are beyond reproach. And Arsene Wenger's eyesight is the best in the world and he's never ever been known to winge. EVER!

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Spuds ship 8 goals in 2 games. Interestingly many

> of their fans are blaming the talk of the

> twitching Churchill dog taking the England job.

> Not just the fact thay were out scored in 2

> weekends then?



I don't where the fuck you get your information from? Perhaps you've forgotten we scored five against Newcastle? OK it's gone a bit tits up since then but we'll be back winning again very soon.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...