Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Would you want to invest in a company with a 49m

> potential liability? I don't think any deal will

> be a good one for investors but instead it will be

> a case of people being willing to put their hand

> in their pocket to save a great club.


Would depend how much money I had and could afford to lose.

Small change compared to the alleged ?2 billion Abramovich has spent at Chelsea.

I don't make it personal - you just take everything I say to heart. I can't help it if you are insecure and can't take a bit of banter. Why is it Man U and Man C fans, and Spurs and Arsenal fans can mock each other and no one seems to get as offended as you??

Also, in response to your point on finances... Check the small print. You'll find Celtic are ?30m in the red. It might be in the red to their sugar daddy, but the loans are there. Would you say ?30m in the red is a good financial 'code of conduct'?


Parkdrive - no one is saying you should. I just wondered if you had a specific reason.

Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish in the expectation of turning things around, to boost that ambition they spent huge amounts of money, a luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given all of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you imagine the grief and abuse he would have got. God alone knows what the EDFers would have said if the Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor result yesterday. So much for the return of the king, more like the emperors new clothes.

Parkdrive Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish in

> the expectation of turning things around, to boost

> that ambition they spent huge amounts of money, a

> luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given all

> of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you

> imagine the grief and abuse he would have got. God

> alone knows what the EDFers would have said if the

> Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed

> like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think

> Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor result

> yesterday. So much for the return of the king,

> more like the emperors new clothes.


Liverpool record under Roy Hodgson


10 wins out of 20 got him the sack. ?20m spent.


Liverpool record under Dalglish


10 wins out of 27. ?100m spent.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Parkdrive Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Consider this. Liverpool brought back Dalglish

> in

> > the expectation of turning things around, to

> boost

> > that ambition they spent huge amounts of money,

> a

> > luxury they did not extend to Hodgson. Given

> all

> > of that, had Hodgson done the same, can you

> > imagine the grief and abuse he would have got.

> God

> > alone knows what the EDFers would have said if

> the

> > Arsenal had spent as much and we had performed

> > like Liverpool. Yet nobody seems to think

> > Dalglish isn't up to the job, another poor

> result

> > yesterday. So much for the return of the king,

> > more like the emperors new clothes.

>

> Liverpool record under Roy Hodgson

>

> 10 wins out of 20 got him the sack. ?20m spent.

>

> Liverpool record under Dalglish

>

> 10 wins out of 27. ?100m spent.



I rest my case.

I think the newish owners will stick with Kenny for the time being. It has been a pretty shit season so far, although FA Cup still a possibility), and I'm forced to admit that most of the new players haven't set the world on fire. I'll happily wait til the end of next season before making my judgement.


I agree, and said at the time, that Woy was very poorly treated, and deserved better from club and fans, but unfortunately for him, he was seen as Hicks and Gillett's man, so he was never going to get a fair run.

I would be interested as to how you arrived at that 80% figure Anna.

Was it from posts during the last week, month, 3 months etc?

If it includes posts made around the Suarez incident, then that would skew any 'statistical analysis'.

Do you perceive Otta's last post as 'slating' Liverpool?

SCSB79 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HMRC have said they are willing to do a deal.

> The big tax case findings are yet to be released

> so no one knows what the full liability could

> be.... and of that, HMRC will maybe deal at

> something like 10p in the pound.




Rangers' future has been secured. But only at the expense of a deal with HMRC over stadium naming rights. Ibrox is to be renamed the Inland Revenue Arena, or IRA for short. But please note this is only Provisional.


:)):))

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you lot realise that 80% of the posts on here

> are slating Liverpool.

>

> It's a shame you don't put as much effort in to

> backing your own team as you do slating ours.



I'm just questioning the dogs abuse Hodgson got when you consider the performance under Dalglish is poor and the the money he's spent far exceeds that spent by Hodgson. If that's slating, then guilty as charged.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would be interested as to how you arrived at

> that 80% figure Anna.

> Was it from posts during the last week, month, 3

> months etc?

> If it includes posts made around the Suarez

> incident, then that would skew any 'statistical

> analysis'.

> Do you perceive Otta's last post as 'slating'

> Liverpool?


Siege mentality.

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you lot realise that 80% of the posts on here

> are slating Liverpool.



As this is from a scouser I expected a 'Thanks for giving me something to whine about'. There's just no pleasing you lot with your Beatles and your Brookside ferries

Anyone else think that Mancini was somewhat less than gracious with his recent remarks prior to United games? They would win against Spurs and that WBA was an easy game. I think it's very difficult to make assumptions like this in the EPL and his remarks were insulting to Spurs and Albion. Swansea I suppose was a very difficult game.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Work such as dry rot treatment will have a guarantee.  Major works as such are more general and I've not seen guarantees on any I've had done. You need to find the source of the damp and the cause of it and be able to demonstrate that it's down to the works that have been done.
    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 [email protected] Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...