Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Atticus, you take exception to everything I say, and it's boring. Feel patronised all you like, I didn't intend it, but I won't apologise for it.


I certainly don't think I can talk for scoucers, and a lot of the fans I'm talking about are not even scouse.


What if I, as a Londoner who was 10 at the time of the disaster, and had no link to anyone who was affected started claiming to feel grief over it? I think that would make me a fucking idiot.


I would say exactly the same thing if it was any other team, I have nothing at all against scoucers as a whole, and count several as good friends.


But of course, you'll think the whole world is against you, because that seems to be your thing.

there you go again, 'I think the whole world id against me'. How is that not patronising? How is claiming that we all think we are funny not patronising... there are more examples. You have the issue here, not me and somewat ironically it is you who is acting the victim. Get over it.

In fact Atticus, do me and yourself a favour, and put me on ignore. You have decided that I live to dig out scoucers (not true), and you read in to my posts stuff which just isn't there.


Put me on ignore, and you won't have to see it, and in turn, I won't be aaccused of shit by a very paranoid person.

Okay then, tell me the things I've said that have upset you, and I'll address them.


When, for example, I said about scoucers thinking they're dead funny and cheeky, I never meant everyone ever born in Liverpool. It is a stereotype, and stereotypes tend to exist for a reason.


In fact, don't bother, just stick me on ignore. I'll never convince you that I don't have some deep issue with your scouse brethren, and frankly, I can't be arsed trying. You don't like me, I'll just have to shoulder that burden. It'll be a lifelong struggle, but I suspect I'll manage.

Atticus - you are making yourself look very foolish here. I can't see anything Otta has said that could be deemed even mildly, much less "very" offensive


Some Liverpool fans are waaaaaay oversensitive - and refusing money from AD because they took "offence" at what he said just proves the point.


All season long people have had to listen to many Liverpool fans adopt an odd, seige-like mentality (Suarez anyone?) and Otta has been brave enough to step aside from that particular consenus and give a more reasoned opinion


Not really sure what your beef is

Otta, the use of 'twisted' towards all LFC fans I find offensive, you haven't addressed that yet. your sign-off reflects that of a sulky teenager determined to claim the higher moral ground. tip, don't go getting upset when writing stuff that might offend, offends on a public forum. Now roll up your bottom lip and get back to saving the world (I think that is the kind of pay-off you will RESPEK!!!)

what otta said was, was "Hillsborough is different because of all the cover up, and the quest for truth, which keeps it alive, helped by fans' slightly twisted desire to share in the grief in order to feel like part of something, even though they had no link at the time"


Now he could have added "some" before fans, but just because he didn't doesn't mean he meant "all" - that's your interpretation and there is no need for it really

helped by fans' slightly twisted desire to share in the grief in order to feel like part of something, even though they had no link at the time.


Atticus, when you're right, you're right. I should have said "a significant number of fans", rather than relying on the good readers of the EDF to realise that I didn't mean every single fan.


My bad.

Fair enough Atticus (and apologies for the teasing). It's just I think it has come across as rather an ott reaction to a perhaps slightly lazily worded opinion that wasn't without merit.


We've all had ding-dongs in the past, god knows I've had a few, and sometimes it's better to let the mist clear. If you read this thread tomorrow it won't look nearly as bad.


Parkdrive used to be terrible at it, but he's clearly learnt the lessons of letting others' posts get to him, likewise I'm much better at not getting involved in ding-dongs and usually have a quiet pm word to calm waters rather than get stuck into polarised slanging match.


You're not the first and you won't be the last to bite at something and overreact.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> RD, why do you feel affected by Munich? I'm not

> taking the p!ss, it's a genuine question.


Munich is ingrained in Utd's history and the club's psyche. As a supporter you absorb all that.

I don't walk around with a heavy heart thinking about Munich all the time, but on or near the anniversary I do stop and think about what happened, especially if it coincides with a matchday. When it does, there's always a sombre air at the ground.

Personally I don't feel grief, as I know what real grief is having lost close family and recently my best friend, but there is a sense of sadness.

As a club we probably have a sense of closure over Munich, eventually out of the tragedy came triumph when we won the European Cup under Busby.

As you pointed out, LFC don't have that sense of closure, and to some of their fans maybe they probably never will.

I agree LFC don't have a right not to play on the anniversary, but I understand why they wouldn't want to.

Saw the PM before seeing this, so responded to that.


Won't post the whole PM, but will repeat that if I said "I thought it was disgusting when Chelsea fans started booing the minutes silence", I'd assume (perhaps wrongly) that it was obvious I didn't mean every single Chelsea fan, and that there was no need to add "some".


Anyway, I'm sure everyone is bored of this now.


LadyG, I'd like to see an exciting run in, but even if City beat United in the big match, I still see them dropping more points.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...