Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One can only live in hope they give it away to

> Spurs this time around.


That's the least of their problems. According to recent reports, Redknapp said he wanted the club to be bold in the transfer market if they wanted to compete for the premiership. Well his track record isn't particularly good if you look at clubs like Portsmouth, Southampton & West Ham all enjoying championship football after Harry's ambitions.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > One can only live in hope they give it away to

> > Spurs this time around.

>

> That's the least of their problems. According to

> recent reports, Redknapp said he wanted the club

> to be bold in the transfer market if they wanted

> to compete for the premiership. Well his track

> record isn't particularly good if you look at

> clubs like Portsmouth, Southampton & West Ham all

> enjoying championship football after Harry's

> ambitions.



What rubbish.


Steve Wigley got Saints in terminal trouble and Glen Roeder (allbeit as a patsy) got WH relegated nearly two years after Harry had rowed with the board and left.

Camara was wanted got rid of at ?600,000. West Ham payed ?1.5m with his agent (step forward Mark Redknapp) taking 50% of any price above that he got as commision. KERCHING ?450,000 and another snooker room at Sandbanks..that's how the odious Redknapp fooks your club up



alledgedly

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Levy does all transfer busniness at Spurs. Harry

> might identify a player he fancies but if Levy

> says no he don't get. Harry has nothing to do with

> any financial dealings at White Hart Lane.


No wonder he looks so gloomy these days.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Levy does all transfer busniness at Spurs. Harry

> might identify a player he fancies but if Levy

> says no he don't get. Harry has nothing to do with

> any financial dealings at White Hart Lane.



Oh agree Jah, Levy's far too smart for 'Arry's tricks plus the days of all sorts of extras for the managers are noiw over. But ultimately, Harry persuaded a reluctant Rio to leave UP for a big money deal, most of which was spent on dross of who significant parts of their fees went to Harry or his son is how thw allegations go. That's what many West Ham fans think and certainly it's never been really explained why Harry got the sack - he still claims it was becuase of something he said in a fanzine interview as that was obvioulsy the agreed party line. Blokes is as dodgy as f*ck in my opinion.

Dodgy is as dodgy does (eh?) and Redknapp's past involvement in transfers was allowed to be 'sketchy' by the bent b*st*rds that ran the club and ultimately couldn't wait to sell out to a pie-in-the-sky biscuit merchant...


btw - why IS T. Brown honorary life president?!? Services to fuck- uppery?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FA Cup about to kick off - absolute joke. Consult

> the FA on how to devalue the World's oldest cup

> competition down to nearly meaningless.



Totally agree here and what's more the European Champions League Cup final being played on a Saturday night. Bah! I've got two parties to go on the 19th. Bloody UEFA cunts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A shout out for Mark, owner of Pure Plumbers. 07970 971510 They're well established in the Sevenoaks area, but have recently started doing more work in SE London.  Did some v quick and efficient bathroom and boiler fixes for me; have also seen some of the bathrooms he's built, which have a nice attention to detail. Jessica    
    • Totally agree regarding not supporting chains. Gail’s was fine but last time I went in Feb this year, actually walked out Fayetteville looking at menu and waiting 15 minutes to even get glass of water and not busy at all. Staff gone down hill - sooner it goes the better… Always prefer to support non chains - so many lovely places with good food to choose from with pleasant staff who know about customer service and sadly, non English which says a lot for our culture, pubs are also becoming abit of a hit and miss affair but maybe just unlucky. At the end of the day all about the chef. Still abit unclear where new place is located - is it down the road from Goose Green where parade of shops are before Peckham Rye?  
    • Surely only where the local businesses offer clear advantages, otherwise you are rewarding what should be failure. I want to be served by a better bakery than Gail's, not a worse but local independent one. Certainly give a local independent some time to get the offer right, but don't buy goods which are worse and or more expensive just because the outlet isn't a chain. 
    • Let’s just boycott all chains in favour of local businesses.  Places like Gail’s popping up everywhere has a very damaging impact on small businesses. It’s just the same as the new empanadas place but on a bigger scale. I’ll say it a million times more, we hold the power with our choices. Let’s use our power to look after ourselves and our environment (which includes small local family businesses). And yes, I also love Chacarero.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...