Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One can only live in hope they give it away to

> Spurs this time around.


That's the least of their problems. According to recent reports, Redknapp said he wanted the club to be bold in the transfer market if they wanted to compete for the premiership. Well his track record isn't particularly good if you look at clubs like Portsmouth, Southampton & West Ham all enjoying championship football after Harry's ambitions.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > One can only live in hope they give it away to

> > Spurs this time around.

>

> That's the least of their problems. According to

> recent reports, Redknapp said he wanted the club

> to be bold in the transfer market if they wanted

> to compete for the premiership. Well his track

> record isn't particularly good if you look at

> clubs like Portsmouth, Southampton & West Ham all

> enjoying championship football after Harry's

> ambitions.



What rubbish.


Steve Wigley got Saints in terminal trouble and Glen Roeder (allbeit as a patsy) got WH relegated nearly two years after Harry had rowed with the board and left.

Camara was wanted got rid of at ?600,000. West Ham payed ?1.5m with his agent (step forward Mark Redknapp) taking 50% of any price above that he got as commision. KERCHING ?450,000 and another snooker room at Sandbanks..that's how the odious Redknapp fooks your club up



alledgedly

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Levy does all transfer busniness at Spurs. Harry

> might identify a player he fancies but if Levy

> says no he don't get. Harry has nothing to do with

> any financial dealings at White Hart Lane.


No wonder he looks so gloomy these days.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Levy does all transfer busniness at Spurs. Harry

> might identify a player he fancies but if Levy

> says no he don't get. Harry has nothing to do with

> any financial dealings at White Hart Lane.



Oh agree Jah, Levy's far too smart for 'Arry's tricks plus the days of all sorts of extras for the managers are noiw over. But ultimately, Harry persuaded a reluctant Rio to leave UP for a big money deal, most of which was spent on dross of who significant parts of their fees went to Harry or his son is how thw allegations go. That's what many West Ham fans think and certainly it's never been really explained why Harry got the sack - he still claims it was becuase of something he said in a fanzine interview as that was obvioulsy the agreed party line. Blokes is as dodgy as f*ck in my opinion.

Dodgy is as dodgy does (eh?) and Redknapp's past involvement in transfers was allowed to be 'sketchy' by the bent b*st*rds that ran the club and ultimately couldn't wait to sell out to a pie-in-the-sky biscuit merchant...


btw - why IS T. Brown honorary life president?!? Services to fuck- uppery?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FA Cup about to kick off - absolute joke. Consult

> the FA on how to devalue the World's oldest cup

> competition down to nearly meaningless.



Totally agree here and what's more the European Champions League Cup final being played on a Saturday night. Bah! I've got two parties to go on the 19th. Bloody UEFA cunts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...