Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One can only live in hope they give it away to

> Spurs this time around.


That's the least of their problems. According to recent reports, Redknapp said he wanted the club to be bold in the transfer market if they wanted to compete for the premiership. Well his track record isn't particularly good if you look at clubs like Portsmouth, Southampton & West Ham all enjoying championship football after Harry's ambitions.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > One can only live in hope they give it away to

> > Spurs this time around.

>

> That's the least of their problems. According to

> recent reports, Redknapp said he wanted the club

> to be bold in the transfer market if they wanted

> to compete for the premiership. Well his track

> record isn't particularly good if you look at

> clubs like Portsmouth, Southampton & West Ham all

> enjoying championship football after Harry's

> ambitions.



What rubbish.


Steve Wigley got Saints in terminal trouble and Glen Roeder (allbeit as a patsy) got WH relegated nearly two years after Harry had rowed with the board and left.

Camara was wanted got rid of at ?600,000. West Ham payed ?1.5m with his agent (step forward Mark Redknapp) taking 50% of any price above that he got as commision. KERCHING ?450,000 and another snooker room at Sandbanks..that's how the odious Redknapp fooks your club up



alledgedly

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Levy does all transfer busniness at Spurs. Harry

> might identify a player he fancies but if Levy

> says no he don't get. Harry has nothing to do with

> any financial dealings at White Hart Lane.


No wonder he looks so gloomy these days.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Levy does all transfer busniness at Spurs. Harry

> might identify a player he fancies but if Levy

> says no he don't get. Harry has nothing to do with

> any financial dealings at White Hart Lane.



Oh agree Jah, Levy's far too smart for 'Arry's tricks plus the days of all sorts of extras for the managers are noiw over. But ultimately, Harry persuaded a reluctant Rio to leave UP for a big money deal, most of which was spent on dross of who significant parts of their fees went to Harry or his son is how thw allegations go. That's what many West Ham fans think and certainly it's never been really explained why Harry got the sack - he still claims it was becuase of something he said in a fanzine interview as that was obvioulsy the agreed party line. Blokes is as dodgy as f*ck in my opinion.

Dodgy is as dodgy does (eh?) and Redknapp's past involvement in transfers was allowed to be 'sketchy' by the bent b*st*rds that ran the club and ultimately couldn't wait to sell out to a pie-in-the-sky biscuit merchant...


btw - why IS T. Brown honorary life president?!? Services to fuck- uppery?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FA Cup about to kick off - absolute joke. Consult

> the FA on how to devalue the World's oldest cup

> competition down to nearly meaningless.



Totally agree here and what's more the European Champions League Cup final being played on a Saturday night. Bah! I've got two parties to go on the 19th. Bloody UEFA cunts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Found at Upland Road bus stop 
    • Can we change the title of this thread please.  Every time I see it I think the pool has been closed again. 😆😆
    • Still a large patch of grit clearly visible in the middle of the pool yesterday (Tuesday).  On the plus side - the water was a lot warmer!
    • Thanks for the response and to some who PM’d me. I’m now included on the Patient Participation Group (meeting next in Dec) so I’m going to feed back the comments here, good and bad. Update today to PPG members is that, as some of you have said, there is a new contact in place with GP practices with effect from 1 Oct. That appears to be the driver for some of the changes we’ve seen at The Gardens. From the responses here, though, patients might be getting an inconsistent message from the Surgery; I was definitely told that appointments must be made through the app, and only the app. It was only when I expressed concern that a strictly online service would not be suitable for all, that I was told by the receptionist that she could complete the request for me (or others if needed). Even then, then patients would need to await a text from the Practice. Perhaps we are just teething problems with the new provision…Happy to bring any and all comments to the PPG meeting (although I’m aware that the most digitally-excluded people probably aren’t on EDF!) Thanks folks.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...