Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One can only live in hope they give it away to

> Spurs this time around.


That's the least of their problems. According to recent reports, Redknapp said he wanted the club to be bold in the transfer market if they wanted to compete for the premiership. Well his track record isn't particularly good if you look at clubs like Portsmouth, Southampton & West Ham all enjoying championship football after Harry's ambitions.

Undisputedtruth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > One can only live in hope they give it away to

> > Spurs this time around.

>

> That's the least of their problems. According to

> recent reports, Redknapp said he wanted the club

> to be bold in the transfer market if they wanted

> to compete for the premiership. Well his track

> record isn't particularly good if you look at

> clubs like Portsmouth, Southampton & West Ham all

> enjoying championship football after Harry's

> ambitions.



What rubbish.


Steve Wigley got Saints in terminal trouble and Glen Roeder (allbeit as a patsy) got WH relegated nearly two years after Harry had rowed with the board and left.

Camara was wanted got rid of at ?600,000. West Ham payed ?1.5m with his agent (step forward Mark Redknapp) taking 50% of any price above that he got as commision. KERCHING ?450,000 and another snooker room at Sandbanks..that's how the odious Redknapp fooks your club up



alledgedly

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Levy does all transfer busniness at Spurs. Harry

> might identify a player he fancies but if Levy

> says no he don't get. Harry has nothing to do with

> any financial dealings at White Hart Lane.


No wonder he looks so gloomy these days.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Levy does all transfer busniness at Spurs. Harry

> might identify a player he fancies but if Levy

> says no he don't get. Harry has nothing to do with

> any financial dealings at White Hart Lane.



Oh agree Jah, Levy's far too smart for 'Arry's tricks plus the days of all sorts of extras for the managers are noiw over. But ultimately, Harry persuaded a reluctant Rio to leave UP for a big money deal, most of which was spent on dross of who significant parts of their fees went to Harry or his son is how thw allegations go. That's what many West Ham fans think and certainly it's never been really explained why Harry got the sack - he still claims it was becuase of something he said in a fanzine interview as that was obvioulsy the agreed party line. Blokes is as dodgy as f*ck in my opinion.

Dodgy is as dodgy does (eh?) and Redknapp's past involvement in transfers was allowed to be 'sketchy' by the bent b*st*rds that ran the club and ultimately couldn't wait to sell out to a pie-in-the-sky biscuit merchant...


btw - why IS T. Brown honorary life president?!? Services to fuck- uppery?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FA Cup about to kick off - absolute joke. Consult

> the FA on how to devalue the World's oldest cup

> competition down to nearly meaningless.



Totally agree here and what's more the European Champions League Cup final being played on a Saturday night. Bah! I've got two parties to go on the 19th. Bloody UEFA cunts.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "You have no idea why"   To be fair Sue, it's blindingly obvious to anyone who has a conversation with anyone who isn't a Corbyn supporter. And even some who liked Corbyn (like me initially) found him somewhat flaky even at his most popular But let's say you are right and I have NO idea why anybody might not vote for him. They still didn't vote for him. He lost two elections. The second one badly (and strongly predicted but the stubborn old goat wouldn't budge so we we were stuck with Johnson and another 3 million PMs in the 5 years that followed) So even with ZERO evidence, we have our eyes and ears and brains But we do have evidence   https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/27022-their-own-words-why-voters-abandoned-labour
    • As I said, it was my understanding. I worded it very carefully. I didn't/don't know for sure, so clearly not a fact. And hardly an "opinion", which is something completely different. You have no idea what reason anybody might have had for not voting for him (unless you can point to some opinion poll results which actually asked people?)
    • Also, just to add, the threat to kill someone's dog and try to kick it, is an additional extremely unpleasant layer. I have noticed a lot of the burst water balloons lying around in the park too- that is not great for the environment either.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...