Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

Man Utd 2 - 1 Arsenal

Fulham 2 - 0 Everton

Norwich 1 - 1 Stoke

Sunderland 1 - 0 Aston Villa

Swansea 1 - 2 Chelsea

Tottenham 0 - 8 (ok, nil really) Wigan

West Ham 1 - 2 Man City

QPR 1 - 0 Reading

Liverpool 1 - 2 Newcastle

West Brom 1 - 0 Southampton


There you go RD, huggy rules mean I've no chance over the season of course.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> There you go RD, huggy rules mean I've no chance

> over the season of course.


I know. If everyone made regular predictions for the next month then maybe we can scrap earlier predictions so that the points/played average can be used. The problem is when someone misses a week or two, it can skew their average in their favour. I shall keep a table for both scoring systems and see how things pan out...

????

????

Posted
Posted
In terms of scores I think it would maybe just work best to say someone had to have done predictions for 50% of thee games per season? additionally you could have a champions league for those that had say done over 80% means you have to have done a reasonable number so lets class show through ; ). Don't scrap scores so far RD, that's a bit harsh on you/Jah/Otta etc who have done good
red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In terms of scores I think it would maybe just

> work best to say someone had to have done

> predictions for 50% of thee games per season?

> additionally you could have a champions league for

> those that had say done over 80% means you have to

> have done a reasonable number so lets class show

> through ; ). Don't scrap scores so far RD, that's

> a bit harsh on you/Jah/Otta etc who have done good


Agree with minimum participation. CL too. That could kick in when CL last 16 knock-out starts in Spring.

How about when someone misses a week they are given that week's average score? I would've thought neither too great an advantage or disadvantage. I will knock up a table later to see how that would've affected scores up to now...

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Man U 2 Arsenal 2 (probably wishful thinking on my part but a point would be most welcome)

Fulham 1 Everton 2

Norwich 1 Stoke 0

Sunderland 1 Aston Villa 1

Swansea 1 Chelsea 4

Spuds 2 Wigan 1

West Ham 1 Man City 3

QPR 1 Reading 1

Liverpool 1 Newcastle 2

West Brom 2 Saints 1

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

Robbie Keane (?20 million), Alberto Aquilani (?20 million), Downing (?20 million), Henderson (?18 million), Carroll (?35 million), Adam (?9 million) and Enrique (?7 million)


That is a shocking line up (and it doesn't even include ?35m Caroll).


Biggest problem is they are going to have to take huge losses in order to unload any of these players, but IMO, there is no point throwing good money after bad, so just take the loss on the chin, and save on their undoubtedly high wages.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Hmmmm.....has Hugenuts put a spanner in the works? He's not even in the fecking competition and yet you're blindly following his rules. I think he's having a little chuckle at us over in Singapore.



Man Utd 2 - 1 Arsenal

Fulham 2 - 2 Everton

Norwich 2 - 1 Stoke

Sunderland 1 - 0 Aston Villa

Swansea 2 - 3 Chelsea

Tottenham 3 - 1 Wigan

West Ham 1 - 3 Man City

QPR 1 - 0 Reading

Liverpool 2 - 2 Newcastle

West Brom 2 - 0 Southampton

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think Celtic will do well to hold onto

> Wanyama...




MANCHESTER United are reportedly lining up a ?12million January move for Celtic star Victor Wanyama.



Hoops boss Neil Lennon valued the midfielder at ?25m, but United manager Sir Alex Ferguson is seemingly ready to make his move and test the water with a bid of around half that

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Don't worry Jah, nothing is set in stone at the mo, just open to ideas. What started off as a bit of fun is getting a bit more competitive :)

This latest table incorporates average scores (shown in red) for players that miss a week.

It also includes a minimum participation rule. I'm going to set the bar higher than ???? suggested 50%, and make it 75%.

This hopefuly will encourage players to participate rather than rely on getting an average score.

Anyone with less than 75% (shown in indigo) wouldn't qualify for CL and final table consideration...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Blah Blah
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Jules-and-Boo
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Jules-and-Boo · Posted

      Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • snowy
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By snowy · Posted

      That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...