Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Week 17 scores...


AM - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts

RC - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts


OT - 4 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 10 pts


JL - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

PD - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

SC - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


EP - Played a Maxxi = 5pts


?? - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

DR - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

MM - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

Mx - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

RD - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


LG - 0 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 0 pts



Note: If two teams are tied on the same number of points in the league, the team with the highest participation % will finish higher, eg JL & AM.


I will make a decision about the FA Cup competition and it's format this afternoon...

AM - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts

RC - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts


OT - 4 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 10 pts


JL - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

PD - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

SC - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts


EP - Played a Maxxi = 5pts


?? - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

DR - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

MM - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

Mx - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts

RD - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


LG - 0 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 0 pts



What this week shows perfectly, reading the right hand column, is that it is the correct results that mean everything. It's good fun though, am not complaining. (just didn't happen to get any correct scores this week :( )

The FA Cup Predictor Cup:


Ok, there wasn't a massive amount of feedback on what format it should take, but the majority consensus was that it should be kept separate from the League. So we will.

As some have indicated that they might not even participate, I think we need to be flexible. I'm therefore proposing an initial league which will eventually become a straight knock-out competition. It will depend on how many participate as to when this happens, hence the need for flexibility. The aim is to have the top 8 teams go into the knock-out stage at the QF stage of the FA Cup. I will draw teams out to play each other...Fluffy and Hardface, next door's cats, will act as independent assessors (Woodrot permitting). If turnout is below 8, the competition will be binned.

To encourage turnout I've picked out the 10 most 'interesting' ties, keeping with the spirit of the competition of potential cup shocks...yes I know, Arsenal to beat Swansea is a bit far fetched, but stranger things happen at sea.


So, here goes...


Brighton V Newcastle

Bolton V Sunderland

Crawley V Reading

Crystal Palace V Stoke

Luton V Wolves

Macclesfield V Cardiff

Peterborough V Norwich


Swansea V Arsenal

Mansfield V Liverpool


Cheltenham V Everton

red devil Wrote:


>

> Note: If two teams are tied on the same number of

> points in the league, the team with the highest

> participation % will finish higher, eg JL & AM.

>

Surely as the initial rule stated a minimum of 75% participation was required for it to count, then if two 'teams' are tied, the one with the lower number of entries has the better average and thus should finish higher?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good work RD I think that's a great idea and will

> have a shot. I think you were wise to keep the

> Third Round bankers like West Ham at home out of

> the mix :)


It'll be a cracking atmosphere with a big away support, but I think you'll nick it...

Not many home bankers there RD - or ARE there?


Brighton 1 V Newcastle 1

Bolton 1 V Sunderland 2

Crawley 0 V Reading 2

Crystal Palace 0 V Stoke 1

Luton 1 V Wolves 2

Macclesfield 0 V Cardiff 3

Peterborough 0 V Norwich 2


Swansea 2 V Arsenal 2

Mansfield 1 V Liverpool 4


Cheltenham 0 V Everton 3



@AM - the one with the lower participation %age has benefitted from more 'maxxi's which, as form has shown, are on the generous side at 5pts ea. so I think RD's right.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good work RD I think that's a great idea and

> will

> > have a shot. I think you were wise to keep the

> > Third Round bankers like West Ham at home out

> of

> > the mix :)

>

> It'll be a cracking atmosphere with a big away

> support, but I think you'll nick it...



Oh great - now you've really gone and nixed it - unless that was your intention in which case as you were B).

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

>

> >

> > Note: If two teams are tied on the same number

> of

> > points in the league, the team with the highest

> > participation % will finish higher, eg JL & AM.

> >

> Surely as the initial rule stated a minimum of 75%

> participation was required for it to count, then

> if two 'teams' are tied, the one with the lower

> number of entries has the better average and thus

> should finish higher?


Average scores can be misleading, I therefore think credit should be given to those who have participated more.

I was surprised that LadyGooner went for only 4 predictions last week, because unless she got a a correct score she was never going to beat a maxxi. So if she finished level with someone who had played more maxxi's, I think she deserves to finish higher on that basis alone...


ETA typo

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Oh great - now you've really gone and nixed it -

> unless that was your intention in which case as

> you were B).


I'm being serious, honest!

History says Fergie will rest a lot of players and play younger/inexperienced, whereas because of injuries and relative mid-table security, Big Sam can afford to go for it with a strong team...I'm happy to be proved wrong though ;-)

History says BFS don't hold much of a torch to this competition...the cynical bit in me thinks that he'd be ok if we go out to Utd, as that's excusable, and concentrate on mid-table safety. Will be a decent old school atmosphere as always tho and probably a decent game. 1-3 :(

First off many thanks again for sorting this out week in week out

and then what a cracking week I had lovely....


Brighton 1 V Newcastle 1

Bolton 1 V Sunderland 0

Crawley 0 V Reading 0

Crystal Palace 0 V Stoke 1

Luton 3 V Wolves 2

Macclesfield 0 V Cardiff 1

Peterborough 1 V Norwich 0


Swansea 1 V Arsenal 0


Mansfield 0 V Liverpool 2


Cheltenham 0 V Everton 2

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Congratulations to LadyGooner, our second winner

> of the Coup de Mis?re...

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/file.php?2

> 0,file=74315


Thank you so much - I am delighted to receive it!

My lungs of phlegm are draining, my pleurisy is easing; I might try this prediction thing again without the cloudy head I've 'enjoyed' the whole bloody christmas break.


Brighton 1 V Newcastle 1

Bolton 0 V Sunderland 2

Crawley 1 V Reading 4

Crystal Palace 1 V Stoke 1

Luton 2 V Wolves 1

Macclesfield 0 V Cardiff 1

Peterborough 0 V Norwich 3


Swansea 2 V Arsenal 1


Mansfield 2 V Liverpool 5


Cheltenham 0 V Everton 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A new roadmap (surely railmap?!) for rail accessibility has been published: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessible-railways-roadmap It says "approximately 56% of stations and around 66% of the 1.3 billion journeys that take place on the network have step-free access to platforms...  "£373 million has been committed over the next 5 years to deliver Access for All projects, providing step-free access from station entrances to and between platforms, alongside other essential accessibility upgrades. These works, together, will increase the number of step-free stations across Great Britain from 56% to 58%. "This improvement will make travel easier with step-free access available at stations covering an increased share of total rail journeys – from 66% up to 71%" Don't know what that means for us here: upgrading Peckham Rye would cover a lot of rail journeys but the cost has no doubt increased from the £40m figure previously quoted. So that would eat into a lot of the funding.
    • It's not really though, is it. It's practical.  At least we're allowed Christmas lights.
    • We are the only specialist floor insulation company on the market to focus on insulating from below – meaning almost zero mess, disruption or noise! Warmdwell is extremely proud to receive the highest reviews for our professionalism, reliability, commitment and the all-round ease of doing business with us: we draw our team from professional, creative, educated backgrounds to provide a friendly, problem-solving team with the deepest integrity. We take real care of your home and aim to leave it as spotless as possible. Please check our Google Reviews to speak for us: "We were really pleased with their quote, communication, and with having the job done perfectly with almost zero disruption. We think they left the space cleaner than when they arrived, and we are definitely already getting the effects of a warmer room" – Miriam & Abed, Sevenoaks, Oct 2025 "Laurence and his team were extremely polite & helpful, and the work was performed over just 2 days with minimal disruption. It was absolutely the most relaxed work I have ever had performed on the house!" – Alistair, Cambridge, July 2025 "Extremely friendly, polite and efficient" – Diane, Forest Hill, June 2025 We are always keen to chat through your floor insulation options and provide as much free advice as we can, as well as free quotes and surveys – so why not ask us today about what is possible to protect your floors from the cold ventilation air blowing underneath, keep your heat in and warm up your home? We use high-performance mineral wool slabs, never foam, for so many reasons: it is the ideal flexible material for the irregularities of old floors; is breathable, working with the way your floor has successfully performed for perhaps 100 years or more; can easily be removed to access pipes and cables; and is completely non-combustible. A local business based in Crystal Palace, we work extensively around Dulwich, Herne Hill, Forest Hill, Lewisham, Tooting, Balham and across the south East of England. Please ask us about your floor insulation options or for local project case studies today! Phone Number: 02080792793 Email Address: [email protected] Website: https://warmdwell.co.uk/ View full listing
    • I would recommend the Dulwich Test and Service centre that used to be in Hindemanns road and then moved to the little Trading Estate off Tyrrel Road. I've used them very happily for nearly 40 years. Paul and Reg Shires. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...