Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic

Alan Medic

Posted
Posted

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

>

> >

> > Note: If two teams are tied on the same number

> of

> > points in the league, the team with the highest

> > participation % will finish higher, eg JL & AM.

> >

> Surely as the initial rule stated a minimum of 75%

> participation was required for it to count, then

> if two 'teams' are tied, the one with the lower

> number of entries has the better average and thus

> should finish higher?


I take your points about the 'maxxi's and retract my initial query. Not likely to happen anyway. I would argur though that the <75% ers should be shown lower in the table than others who have less points. For e.g El Pibe can not longer reach the magical 75% as there are not enough weeks left. Don't mind me though. I just like rules.


As for the Cup, I still don't get that. If you only have 8 entries and have 8 q/finalists, everyone qualifies and makes the 3rd,4th and 5th rounds of the cup pointless. I know someone will tell me what I've missed.

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

The only challenge you might have is if those who can't hit the magic 75% lose interest :(


The option's still open to multiply final score (not including maxxis) by percentage of games played, even if it drives Jah wild.


I wish I could play but I know sweet fanny adams about football.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

I would need to go back and look at what was exactly said about the 75% rule. I do know that you needed 75% as an incentive to take part in the Cups, but that has since changed.

You have to remember this wasn't plannned, it just sort of evolved. The maxxi only came about because people joined later than others. Next season, if it's retained, the maxxi will be adjusted to take into account average scores over the whole of this season.

Hopefully next season it will be a lot simpler and clearer, especially as everyone will start at the same time.



Actually you're right, if there were only 8 teams the earlier rounds would be dead ducks. I should've said we need at least 9 teams. Luckily we have at least 9 teams, as ???? will be joining in, so at least one person will get eliminated...

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The option's still open to multiply final score

> (not including maxxis) by percentage of games

> played, even if it drives Jah wild.



Don't worry H, out of curiosity I'm going to apply the Huggy Quotient at the end of the season...although, depending on the outcome, I reserve the right to withhold publication ;-)

????

????

Posted
Posted

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only challenge you might have is if those who

> can't hit the magic 75% lose interest :(

>

> The option's still open to multiply final score

> (not including maxxis) by percentage of games

> played, even if it drives Jah wild.

>

> I wish I could play but I know sweet fanny adams

> about football.


Don't worry Huge it hasn't stopped Mick

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> West Ham fans obviously delighted that JC the

> prodigal son has returned, but I guess less

> enamoured at the prospect of Chamakh rolling up.

> If he does end up in the East End, he's going to

> have to do something with that hair...


I think you'll find most of the British/Asian kids in the East End have got hair just like that.

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> West Ham fans obviously delighted that JC the

> prodigal son has returned, but I guess less

> enamoured at the prospect of Chamakh rolling up.

> If he does end up in the East End, he's going to

> have to do something with that hair...



Their loss our gain. Please let it happen.

maxxi

maxxi

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> West Ham fans obviously delighted that JC the

> prodigal son has returned, but I guess less

> enamoured at the prospect of Chamakh rolling up.


I just hope while he's on loan he proves everyone wrong and manages to change his name from "Oh-no-he's-bringing-on-bloody-Chamakh!" to something a little more positive.


Personally I have more hope for the young Waterford striker, Sean Maguire (no, not the Eastenders actor) working his way into the first team.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Mr F
      Has your child sat 4+ or 7+ assessments?

      By Mr F · Posted

      I am trying to find out about people's experiences of the 4+ and 7+ assessments. I am a teacher and have a wealth of experience tutoring for theses assessments (including my own son), but it's always good to keep on top of things as they always make tweaks to them. TIA! 
    • Sephiroth
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      "Sep, you don't even live here."   ???
    • Sephiroth
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      "You have no idea why"   To be fair Sue, it's blindingly obvious to anyone who has a conversation with anyone who isn't a Corbyn supporter. And even some who liked Corbyn (like me initially) found him somewhat flaky even at his most popular But let's say you are right and I have NO idea why anybody might not vote for him. They still didn't vote for him. He lost two elections. The second one badly (and strongly predicted but the stubborn old goat wouldn't budge so we we were stuck with Johnson and another 3 million PMs in the 5 years that followed) So even with ZERO evidence, we have our eyes and ears and brains But we do have evidence   https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/27022-their-own-words-why-voters-abandoned-labour
    • Sue
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By Sue · Posted

      As I said, it was my understanding. I worded it very carefully. I didn't/don't know for sure, so clearly not a fact. And hardly an "opinion", which is something completely different. You have no idea what reason anybody might have had for not voting for him (unless you can point to some opinion poll results which actually asked people?)

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...