Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Saturday 9th February 2013


Tottenham 2 V Newcastle 0

Chelsea 1 V Wigan 2

Norwich 1 V Fulham 0

Stoke 2 V Reading 2

Sunderland 0 V Arsenal 2

Swansea 3 V QPR 2

Southampton 0 V Man City 3



Sunday 10th February 2013


Aston Villa 1 V West Ham 3

Man Utd 3 V Everton 1



Monday 11th February 2013


Liverpool 4 V West Brom 1

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The best strategy would be to follow our best and

> most consistent predictor, RD. But over a season

> it would be a miracle if he beat the odds. He was

> going to do this as an experiment he said.



My 'experiment' lasted a whole 2 weeks :)


Week 5 (11 points scored)...


I predicted two correct scores @ 17/2. If I had placed ?1 on each of the 9 games I would've made a ?10 profit in total.

I predicted 7 correct results. If I had placed ?1 on each of the 9 games I would've made ?11.50 profit in total.

Total profit ?21.50.



Week 6 (6 points scored)...


1 correct score @ 14/1 = ?4 profit, and 4 correct results returned a loss of ?3.60, so overall a profit of 40p.

Total profit after 2 weeks = ?21.90.



My average score for these two weeks was 8.5pts.

My average score for the whole 21 weeks is just under 7.5pts.

So I performed above average for those two weeks.


I haven't worked out how many correct scores I have predicted, but I reckon they are the key to whether you would make a profit or not. I think you would need to average at least 1 a week, perhaps 3 over 2 weeks, in order to make a profit...

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HAs anyone ever averaged the predictions to see

> how our crowd-prediction skills are?

> I guess a sample of a few thousand is probably

> better, but if it consistently hits the mark we

> could make money!!!


I'd be interested to see how RD has done against the original* over the season so far.


*Lawro.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> El Pibe Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HAs anyone ever averaged the predictions to see

> > how our crowd-prediction skills are?

> > I guess a sample of a few thousand is probably

> > better, but if it consistently hits the mark we

> > could make money!!!

>

> I'd be interested to see how RD has done against

> the original* over the season so far.

>

> *Lawro.


Over 25 weeeks Lawro has scored 179 points, an average of 7.16

Over 25 weeks RD has scored 180 points, an average of 7.20...read it and weep Lawro :)

Saturday 9th February 2013

>

Tottenham 2 V 1 Newcastle

Chelsea 3 V 0 Wigan

Norwich 1 V 1 Fulham

Stoke 1 V 0 Reading

Sunderland 1 V 2 Arsenal

Swansea 2 V 0 QPR

Southampton 0 V 3 Man City



Sunday 10th February 2013


Aston Villa 2 V 1 West Ham

Man Utd 3 V 0 Everton



Monday 11th February 2013


Liverpool 2 V 0 West Brom

Right everyone, get your passports out and Sergio Tacchini tops on, tommorow night is the first set of Champions League games...



Tuesday 12th February 2013


Celtic V Juventus

Valencia V Paris SG



Wednesday 13th February 2013


Real Madrid V Man Utd

Shakhtar Donetsk V Borussia Dortmund

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...