Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bale is the stand out player in the premiership.

> Everyone accepts that. Not sure what world class

> means but he needs to do it in the champions

> league to get proper recognition and acceptance

> across Europe. Wales are prob not going to be at

> the cutting edge of international football, so

> it's down to Spurs to do something in the

> Champions League, to get him the big challenge be

> needs, or he will go elsewhere. Will be

> interesting to see his progress, he keeps getting

> better at Premiership level but bigger platforms

> lie ahead.


Everyone? Not sure about that, RVP was being touted as the player of the season not too long ago and Suarez hasn't been to shabby, nor has Aguero. World class means, for me anyway, that the player has proved it at the highest level, Bale has some way to go so let's not get too carried away. Talented, no doubt, but has had one decent season. Just like RVP really.

Week 27 results.

Lots of correct results this week, but it's correct scores that make the difference...



?? - 2 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 11 pts

JL - 5 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 11 pts


OT - 6 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 9 pts


RD - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts


MM - 7 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 7 pts

Mx - 4 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 7 pts

PD - 7 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 7 pts

RC - 7 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 7 pts

SC - 7 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 7 pts


AM - 6 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 6 pts


EP - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts

LG - 5 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 5 pts

DR - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Week 27 results.

> Lots of correct results this week, but it's

> correct scores that make the difference...

>

>

We should have a separate table for correct results, ignoring correct scores, these people are just lucky. 7 correct results for me - get in.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Correct scores arealso correct results Mick...Jah

> also got 7 correct results, it just so happens

> that 2w were also correct scores...


I got more correct results than Quids ..... that was the point :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone from the school commented? Have they said why? Is it a fresh start? Is it that Grove in the name may have connotations of wealth and they want to attract more applicants from a wider area? Is that it currently is linked to the DKH Estate? 
    • As you quite rightly say a sample of 500 is extremely  small. (actually unrepresentative in the scheme of things) Now corbyn has his own party or should that be Party, it'll be interesting to see if it is merely a "think tank" or if it contests seats and then if they win any and if they chase currently held seats by Labour. It'll be even more amusing if it unseats current Labour Ministers though.   
    • First of all, conversations with people who aren't Corbyn supporters are obviously going to tell you why those people didn't vote for him, aren't they? Second (and I don't know why I have to keep on saying this) the electoral system worked against him in terms of seats lost. If you look at the actual numbers of votes per party, yes Labour was behind, but not by as much as it appeared if just seats were counted. Thirdly, that poll was of "nearly 500" people who stopped voting Labour. That's not a very big sample, is it? Of those, 35% said it was because of Jeremy Corbyn's leadership (i.e. 65% had other reasons). Even upping the numbers to  500 people, 35% is 175. 10,269,051  people did actually vote Labour in that election. It's a long time since I used statistics for anything, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think anything you have said is "evidence"!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...