Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see myself as a Mourinho type. Not a great

> player myself but I can help others outperform

> their normal capabilities. Hence I'm reaching out

> to AM to help him through this.


I started so well yesterday Mick. Where did it go wrong?

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'll call tails as apparently it never fails.

> >

> > Cue heads.

>

> Heads it is


Damn it, knocked out at the semi final stage by the toss of a coin.

Week 29 results...



PD - 3 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 12 pts

RC - 6 Correct Results + 2 Correct Score = 12 pts


EP - 5 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 11 pts


?? - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts

Mx - 2 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 8 pts

RD - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts


AM - 1 Correct Result + 2 Correct Scores = 7 pts


OT - 3 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 6 pts


JL - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts

DR - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

SC - Played a maxxi = 5 pts


LG - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


MM - Cheats Never Prosper = 0 pts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mack will score nil points this week...them's

> the rules


Jose didn't actually make any predictions thus he should be entitled to a maxxi. At least if he took it to the European Court he would!


Defence: Did you type any predictions MM?

MM: No

Judge: Case dismissed


What about all those who scored maxxi's the week there were only 6 fixtures. Surely that's ungentlemanly conduct? Even I was tempted and I'm a feckin saint.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The Sky article says the manager has apologised. Apparently, according to the article the person who said they'd apply on Rachel and her husband behalf left and didn't hand the job on. Here's the article https://news.sky.com/story/politics-latest-reeves-rent-mistake-labour-starmer-asylum-budget-tax-farage-reform-12593360?postid=10440668#liveblog-body
    • Or another thing journalists could do if they wanted to is unearth how many reform or Tory MPs are landlords with similar or worse errors   
    • I'm utterly baffled as to why anybody thinks this is newsworthy, let alone worth a front page. The economy has barely grown for 20 years and the housing crisis has been worsening for a similar time period. Note to any journalists on the forum: maybe focus your headlines on important issues.
    • Two wrongs might not make a right. But the two wrongs could at least be of equal value before we get too judgey    paying an estate agent to deal with all of the admin on my to have the estate agent not point out all of the admin  vs Deliberately hacking into an MPs email. And boasting about it (Badenoch)    as for throwing a local estate agent under the bus, when did local estate agents become the good guys?   doesn’t sound like estate agents are being thrown under a bus - they are fessing up. And Reeves doesn’t look to have done anything wrong  yet people will still believe the worst anyway    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/30/rachel-reeves-row-standards-adviser-looking-at-new-infomation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...