Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see myself as a Mourinho type. Not a great

> player myself but I can help others outperform

> their normal capabilities. Hence I'm reaching out

> to AM to help him through this.


I started so well yesterday Mick. Where did it go wrong?

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'll call tails as apparently it never fails.

> >

> > Cue heads.

>

> Heads it is


Damn it, knocked out at the semi final stage by the toss of a coin.

Week 29 results...



PD - 3 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 12 pts

RC - 6 Correct Results + 2 Correct Score = 12 pts


EP - 5 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 11 pts


?? - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts

Mx - 2 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 8 pts

RD - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts


AM - 1 Correct Result + 2 Correct Scores = 7 pts


OT - 3 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 6 pts


JL - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts

DR - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

SC - Played a maxxi = 5 pts


LG - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


MM - Cheats Never Prosper = 0 pts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mack will score nil points this week...them's

> the rules


Jose didn't actually make any predictions thus he should be entitled to a maxxi. At least if he took it to the European Court he would!


Defence: Did you type any predictions MM?

MM: No

Judge: Case dismissed


What about all those who scored maxxi's the week there were only 6 fixtures. Surely that's ungentlemanly conduct? Even I was tempted and I'm a feckin saint.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's interesting how local businesses and the people that own / work in them are not considered part of the "community". The dictionary says "a group of people living in the same place" as the principal definition. Why are we forced to accept a secondary definition where those who don't live in social housing, the vast majority of people in East Dulwich, are told to shut up?
    • They often grow in the angle between wall and pavement which could cause damage to the foundation of the wall and leave the council open to being sued.
    • If weeds are allowed to grow for too long they lift pavements and create obvious tripping hazards. Obviously removing them from your wall and/or garden is unacceptable. 
    • This is NEXT WEDNESDAY 11 June! Just turn up if you prefer not to give prior notice! The Palmerston from  7pm, turn left as you come in! (If you have been hiding under a rock, The Palmerston is the pub on Lordship Lane on the corner of North Cross Road).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...