Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see myself as a Mourinho type. Not a great

> player myself but I can help others outperform

> their normal capabilities. Hence I'm reaching out

> to AM to help him through this.


I started so well yesterday Mick. Where did it go wrong?

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'll call tails as apparently it never fails.

> >

> > Cue heads.

>

> Heads it is


Damn it, knocked out at the semi final stage by the toss of a coin.

Week 29 results...



PD - 3 Correct Results + 3 Correct Scores = 12 pts

RC - 6 Correct Results + 2 Correct Score = 12 pts


EP - 5 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 11 pts


?? - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts

Mx - 2 Correct Results + 2 Correct Scores = 8 pts

RD - 5 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 8 pts


AM - 1 Correct Result + 2 Correct Scores = 7 pts


OT - 3 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 6 pts


JL - 2 Correct Results + 1 Correct Score = 5 pts

DR - Played a maxxi = 5 pts

SC - Played a maxxi = 5 pts


LG - 4 Correct Results + 0 Correct Scores = 4 pts


MM - Cheats Never Prosper = 0 pts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mack will score nil points this week...them's

> the rules


Jose didn't actually make any predictions thus he should be entitled to a maxxi. At least if he took it to the European Court he would!


Defence: Did you type any predictions MM?

MM: No

Judge: Case dismissed


What about all those who scored maxxi's the week there were only 6 fixtures. Surely that's ungentlemanly conduct? Even I was tempted and I'm a feckin saint.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The step means Love Dulwich is not disabled friendly though they went to help someone on  crutches up the step last time we were there  much prefer it as a Turkish than café but maybe not for this group   The noise level might be an issue as it’s all hard surfaces though I don’t recall it being noisy. check out Olivelli the menu has a good range  though it’s not the best Italian you can get. There’s also a step up into Maria’s - much smaller but you need to negotiate the step and door at the same time. Olivelli has more room and if I remember right the toilets are on the ground floor. A consideration if steps are an issue The Lordship might be an option. Noise is not usually an issue. We’ve enjoyed various meals there. The ladies toilets are on the same floor as the tables (the gents may be upstairs). The staff are always friendly
    • It’s about chains, and the ethos of family run business versus unhealthy competition 
    • 'Tom Lehrer, acclaimed musical satirist of cold war era, dies aged 97' https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/jul/28/tom-lehrer-dies-aged-97-dead-musical-satirist  
    • But all those examples sell a wide variety of things,  and mostly they are well spread out along Lordship Lane. These two shops both sell one very specific thing, albeit in different flavours, and are just across the road from each other. I don't think you can compare the distribution of shops in Roman times to the distribution of shops in Lordship Lane in the twenty first century. Well, you can, but it doesn't feel very appropriate. Haa anybody asked the first shop how they feel? Are they happy about the "healthy competition" ?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...