Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

El Pibe

El Pibe

Posted
Posted

Man Utd 2 - 1 Arsenal

Fulham 2 - 0 Everton

Norwich 1 - 1 Stoke

Sunderland 1 - 0 Aston Villa

Swansea 1 - 2 Chelsea

Tottenham 0 - 8 (ok, nil really) Wigan

West Ham 1 - 2 Man City

QPR 1 - 0 Reading

Liverpool 1 - 2 Newcastle

West Brom 1 - 0 Southampton


There you go RD, huggy rules mean I've no chance over the season of course.

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> There you go RD, huggy rules mean I've no chance

> over the season of course.


I know. If everyone made regular predictions for the next month then maybe we can scrap earlier predictions so that the points/played average can be used. The problem is when someone misses a week or two, it can skew their average in their favour. I shall keep a table for both scoring systems and see how things pan out...

????

????

Posted
Posted
In terms of scores I think it would maybe just work best to say someone had to have done predictions for 50% of thee games per season? additionally you could have a champions league for those that had say done over 80% means you have to have done a reasonable number so lets class show through ; ). Don't scrap scores so far RD, that's a bit harsh on you/Jah/Otta etc who have done good
red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In terms of scores I think it would maybe just

> work best to say someone had to have done

> predictions for 50% of thee games per season?

> additionally you could have a champions league for

> those that had say done over 80% means you have to

> have done a reasonable number so lets class show

> through ; ). Don't scrap scores so far RD, that's

> a bit harsh on you/Jah/Otta etc who have done good


Agree with minimum participation. CL too. That could kick in when CL last 16 knock-out starts in Spring.

How about when someone misses a week they are given that week's average score? I would've thought neither too great an advantage or disadvantage. I will knock up a table later to see how that would've affected scores up to now...

Parkdrive

Parkdrive

Posted
Posted

Man U 2 Arsenal 2 (probably wishful thinking on my part but a point would be most welcome)

Fulham 1 Everton 2

Norwich 1 Stoke 0

Sunderland 1 Aston Villa 1

Swansea 1 Chelsea 4

Spuds 2 Wigan 1

West Ham 1 Man City 3

QPR 1 Reading 1

Liverpool 1 Newcastle 2

West Brom 2 Saints 1

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

Robbie Keane (?20 million), Alberto Aquilani (?20 million), Downing (?20 million), Henderson (?18 million), Carroll (?35 million), Adam (?9 million) and Enrique (?7 million)


That is a shocking line up (and it doesn't even include ?35m Caroll).


Biggest problem is they are going to have to take huge losses in order to unload any of these players, but IMO, there is no point throwing good money after bad, so just take the loss on the chin, and save on their undoubtedly high wages.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Hmmmm.....has Hugenuts put a spanner in the works? He's not even in the fecking competition and yet you're blindly following his rules. I think he's having a little chuckle at us over in Singapore.



Man Utd 2 - 1 Arsenal

Fulham 2 - 2 Everton

Norwich 2 - 1 Stoke

Sunderland 1 - 0 Aston Villa

Swansea 2 - 3 Chelsea

Tottenham 3 - 1 Wigan

West Ham 1 - 3 Man City

QPR 1 - 0 Reading

Liverpool 2 - 2 Newcastle

West Brom 2 - 0 Southampton

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think Celtic will do well to hold onto

> Wanyama...




MANCHESTER United are reportedly lining up a ?12million January move for Celtic star Victor Wanyama.



Hoops boss Neil Lennon valued the midfielder at ?25m, but United manager Sir Alex Ferguson is seemingly ready to make his move and test the water with a bid of around half that

red devil

red devil

Posted
Posted

Don't worry Jah, nothing is set in stone at the mo, just open to ideas. What started off as a bit of fun is getting a bit more competitive :)

This latest table incorporates average scores (shown in red) for players that miss a week.

It also includes a minimum participation rule. I'm going to set the bar higher than ???? suggested 50%, and make it 75%.

This hopefuly will encourage players to participate rather than rely on getting an average score.

Anyone with less than 75% (shown in indigo) wouldn't qualify for CL and final table consideration...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Sue
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By Sue · Posted

      They used to have dedicated park wardens, who I'm sure used to look after the parks and locked and opened the gates. Years ago I knew someone who was one. I thought they were based in that hut by the toilets. Are they not there any more? The community wardens are attached to the police rather than a specific park, aren't they?
    • rollflick
      Great news! Peckham Rye station to reclaim its public square by next year!

      By rollflick · Posted

      Yes, sad how Rye Lane has taken a dive, interesting to see those pics CPR Dave. It's shocking how the section between Choumert Road and the Nag's Head in particular has lost its vibrancy, meanwhile the next section to the top of Peckham Rye Common has gentrified. Wonder why such a distinction in fortunes? Anyway the station square plans have fallen behind yet again, demolition won't now start this summer. The only "work" that will now take place this summer is surveying of the arcade, which they've had 10 years since planning permission to do. At least the replacement TSB branch has progressed but the Blenheim Grove corner building still looks unfinished, despite claims it "is now complete". https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/current-and-future-development/peckham-and-nunhead-2
    • FatherJack
      Dog Kennel Hill School to change name

      By FatherJack · Posted

      DKH was two form entry, it is now one form entry to cope with the fact it was far more under subscribed than other schools in the area. They had actually combined year groups into single classes, 3/4 and 5/6.  When a school changes name, it’s usually because of a bad reputation perhaps the results.  The new name is dry with no history unlike its current name. It’s a very sketchy decision. It’s an expensive vanity project for someone.  What  will happen if the name change does not increase applications to the school?     
    • teddyboy23
      The Chapel of Rest

      By teddyboy23 · Posted

      Hulk hogan 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...