Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't have a campaign against the 2nd Amendment,

> I neither know nor care what it is.

>

> I was in fact responding to your original

> statement here: "But what a shame it is that the

> firearms laws in this country are so unnecessarily

> restrictive."

>

> I have pointed out that contrary to your rather

> stupid opinion, the 'shame' is the 12,632 people

> in the US who were murdered at the end of a

> firearm, or the other 25,000 who also died at the

> end of firearms through accident or misadventure.

>

> Your rather 'Smug American' demand for access to

> weapons so you can play with yourself would most

> likely end up with thousands of people dead who

> didn't need to be.

>

> Only someone deranged could think that was a good

> idea.


Then why are you so opposed to the concept?

Dude, you're getting way too butthurt over this. If the figures you've yet to cite are true, then that's a collateral damage I'm willing to live with in order to continue endorsing a liberal attitude to gun ownership. Anyway, people get shot the world over. Get over it, shit happens.

Hugenot,


While not wishing to intrude into your personal battles your

There are 10,000 gun murders a year in the US, and only 10 in the UK.


seems off beam to me.


Without researching it via Google or Wikipedia it seems to me that UK episodes of "going postal" are on the rise. I can think of more than 10 gun related deaths a year in recent times, for example Derrick Bird's (?) Cumbria shootings killed 12 I think last year. We've also had Dunblane and Hungerford in the past.


Locally here in our part of South London gun crime and gun deaths are not remarkable - I think the score is up to about 5 this year alone. In Norway - we recently saw over 85 people killed by gun and bomb by a single person, the problem is not unique to the USA.


The gun crime / gun ownership correlation is intriguing but not proof positive of your argument. Ever tighter UK laws against gun ownership haven't seen a corresponding fall in gun crime.


Your use of absolute figures is also, as you must be aware, misleading. The US has a population more than 5 times as large as UK - that said it would still make the US rate of deaths by gun significantly higher than it is UK - but not the 1000 times you imply.

"Without researching it..."


There's your clue mate. The figures clearly vary dependent upon which year you're looking at. You bizarrely argue that you don't believe the figures merely because you don't want to, which is an illogical approach.


file.php?20,file=31568


"Ever tighter UK laws against gun ownership haven't seen a corresponding fall in gun crime.". I'm not sure what this is referring to, but it seems to be incorrect. This story is describing substantial falls over the last decade. Please note that the '42' figure refers to all deaths, not just homicides. The equivalent 'deaths' figure for the US would be around 35,000.


The fact is that the number of gun homicides in the US simply IS thousands of times larger than the UK.


I have made no claim that restricting access to guns would zero this figure, but you can't kill a person with a gun if you don't have access to one.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Back on topic, has anyone been on a grouse

> shoot

> > or planning on going on one?

>

> Well that's that then. Much as I thought.



NO But watching Rick C & Hugeknot shooting each other in the foot is ( for now ) way more fun.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4d/Wild_turkey_eastern_us.jpg " Waas-up Dude "

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've never got Christmas pudding. The only times I've managed to make it vaguely acceptable to people is thus: Buy a really tiny one when it's remaindered in Tesco's. They confound carbon dating, so the yellow labelled stuff at 75% off on Boxing Day will keep you going for years. Chop it up and soak it in Stones Ginger Wine and left over Scotch. Mix it in with a decent vanilla ice cream. It's like a festive Rum 'n' Raisin. Or: Stick a couple in a demijohn of Aldi vodka and serve it to guests, accompanied by 'The Party's Over' by Johnny Mathis when people simply won't leave your flat.
    • Not miserable at all! I feel the same and also want to complain to the council but not sure who or where best to aim it at? I have flagged it with our local MP and one Southwark councillor previously but only verbally when discussing other things and didn’t get anywhere other than them agreeing it was very frustrating etc. but would love to do something on paper. I think they’ve been pretty much every night for the last couple of weeks and my cat is hating it! As am I !
    • That is also a Young's pub, like The Cherry Tree. However fantastic the menu looks, you might want to ask exactly who will cook the food on the day, and how. Also, if  there is Christmas pudding on the menu, you might want to ask how that will be cooked, and whether it will look and/or taste anything like the Christmas puddings you have had in the past.
    • This reminds me of a situation a few years ago when a mate's Dad was coming down and fancied Franklin's for Christmas Day. He'd been there once, in September, and loved it. Obviously, they're far too tuned in to do it, so having looked around, £100 per head was pretty standard for fairly average pubs around here. That is ridiculous. I'd go with Penguin's idea; one of the best Christmas Day lunches I've ever had was at the Lahore Kebab House in Whitechapel. And it was BYO. After a couple of Guinness outside Franklin's, we decided £100 for four people was the absolute maximum, but it had to be done in the style of Franklin's and sourced within walking distance of The Gowlett. All the supermarkets knock themselves out on veg as a loss leader - particularly anything festive - and the Afghani lads on Rye Lane are brilliant for more esoteric stuff and spices, so it really doesn't need to be pricey. Here's what we came up with. It was considerably less than £100 for four. Bread & Butter (Lidl & Lurpak on offer at Iceland) Mersea Oysters (Sopers) Parsnip & Potato Soup ( I think they were both less than 20 pence a kilo at Morrisons) Smoked mackerel, Jerseys, watercress & radish (Sopers) Rolled turkey breast joint (£7.95 from Iceland) Roast Duck (two for £12 at Lidl) Mash  Carrots, star anise, butter emulsion. Stir-fried Brussels, bacon, chestnuts and Worcestershire sauce.(Lidl) Clementine and limoncello granita (all from Lidl) Stollen (Lidl) Stichelton, Cornish Cruncher, Stinking Bishop. (Marks & Sparks) There was a couple of lessons to learn: Don't freeze mash. It breaks down the cellular structure and ends up more like a French pomme purée. I renamed it 'Pomme Mikael Silvestre' after my favourite French centre-half cum left back and got away with it, but if you're not amongst football fans you may not be so lucky. Tasted great, looked like shit. Don't take the clementine granita out of the freezer too early, particularly if you've overdone it on the limoncello. It melts quickly and someone will suggest snorting it. The sugar really sticks your nostrils together on Boxing Day. Speaking of 'lost' Christmases past, John Lewis have hijacked Alison Limerick's 'Where Love Lives' for their new advert. Bastards. But not a bad ad.   Beansprout, I have a massive steel pot I bought from a Nigerian place on Choumert Road many years ago. It could do with a work out. I'm quite prepared to make a huge, spicy parsnip soup for anyone who fancies it and a few carols.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...