Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So just how long is it since Whately Road was re-surfaced? A matter of weeks I believe. Well today 03/05/18 Thames Water have arrived and guess what are now DIGGING UP an area at the junction with Lordship Lane.


Do Thames water never learn or talk with the council, and how long before the P13 is back on diversion, give me

S-T-R-E-N-G-T-H.


And the Lib Dems where going door to door as I passed through at lunch time, didn't think they were allowed to do so on polling day?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/190696-whatley-road/
Share on other sites

dbboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> And the Lib Dems where going door to door as I

> passed through at lunch time, didn't think they

> were allowed to do so on polling day?


No, there's a ban on broadcasting campaigns imposed by Ofcom, but at a local level you can campaign all you like as long as you don't do it near polling stations.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dbboy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > And the Lib Dems where going door to door as I

> > passed through at lunch time, didn't think they

> > were allowed to do so on polling day?

>

> No, there's a ban on broadcasting campaigns

> imposed by Ofcom, but at a local level you can

> campaign all you like as long as you don't do it

> near polling stations.


Oh that explains why I've had nothing but leaflets from Labour on the Lordship Lane Estate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...