Jump to content

Recommended Posts

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

It is

> also a shame that your post has spun off into a

> petty bicker thread. Again




You think it's "petty bickering" to suggest that reporting suspicious behaviour to the police is a good idea?


You have a strange idea of petty bickering :))

And to join in with Sue, posters offering views about 'low life' doesn't help either. He without sin cast the first stone (from someone who was not always an angel. If you want to read and join in about low life you need the Daily Mail's website. How do you spot low life by the way. Is there a uniform?

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> flocker spotter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> It is

> > also a shame that your post has spun off into a

> > petty bicker thread. Again

>

>

>

> You think it's "petty bickering" to suggest that

> reporting suspicious behaviour to the police is a

> good idea?

>

> You have a strange idea of petty bickering :))


Don't do this. It is tiresome.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And to join in with Sue, posters offering views

> about 'low life' doesn't help either. He without

> sin cast the first stone (from someone who was not

> always an angel. If you want to read and join in

> about low life you need the Daily Mail's website.

> How do you spot low life by the way. Is there a

> uniform?


These are just men who are maybe acting suspiciously (or maybe totally innocent).


The guys who murdered that man for his Rolex in Greenwich are types I'm scared of (and I'm not scared of much - not that I'm brave)

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > flocker spotter Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > It is

> > > also a shame that your post has spun off into

> a

> > > petty bicker thread. Again

> >

> >

> >

> > You think it's "petty bickering" to suggest

> that

> > reporting suspicious behaviour to the police is

> a

> > good idea?

> >

> > You have a strange idea of petty bickering :))

>

> Don't do this. It is tiresome.


Not as tiresome as your operating as some sort of unofficial monitor for the forum, FS, continually telling people to stop doing this that and the other, that seems to be your thing. Why don't you leave it to Admin, who do/does a fine job?


Sue's point was perfectly valid, by the way.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The new commander of Southwark/Lambeth police says

> violent crime has been reduced by 30% since

> January.

>

> https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/violent-crime

> -reduced-30-since-january-says-commander-of-newly-

> merged-southwark-and-lambeth-police/


He would say that wouldn't he...I don't believe a word of it!

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The new commander of Southwark/Lambeth police says

> violent crime has been reduced by 30% since

> January.

>

> https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/violent-crime

> -reduced-30-since-january-says-commander-of-newly-

> merged-southwark-and-lambeth-police/


He might be right

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43640475


It's nearly all moved to north of the river

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The new commander of Southwark/Lambeth police

> says

> > violent crime has been reduced by 30% since

> > January.

> >

> >

> https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/violent-crime

>

> >

> -reduced-30-since-january-says-commander-of-newly-

>

> > merged-southwark-and-lambeth-police/

>

> He might be right

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43640475

>

> It's nearly all moved to north of the river


True - maybe richer pickings I suppose.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...