Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi - has anyone received a final bill yet for the major works completed in 2016? Also is anyone aware of any one raising a legal challenge to the amounts paid? The works to my property included painting and some pointing and I've so far been charged an estimated cost of ?18,000! Thanks
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/191360-southwark-major-works/
Share on other sites

As well as work directly on your flat you might expect to share the costs of (a) scaffolding to work on the property (b) work on common parts shared by different establishments © work on electrical or plumbing services from which you take a shared benefit and (d) work on roofs even where you are not on the top floor - so more than just work on the fabric that you lease. However you should get what itemisation you can - if you are being asked to share costs on work which was exclusively undertaken on other properties (i.e. not common or shared elements) you may have a case, as you would if works charged for weren't in fact undertaken, of if charges for specific works were disproportionate as regards the scale, scope or quality of the work undertaken. Even now that the council and councillors are all of the same party you should still expect support from your local councillor if you feel that the charges are unfair or wrong.

Council tenants have no financial 'interest' in the property (i.e. cannot benefit from increases in value - putting aside the whole 'right to buy' issue) - that interest (in preserving the value of the property through repair and refurbishment) sits with the council (or housing association) for tenanted properties - they will need to demonstrate that the overall cost of the works is being shared equitably between leaseholders and the landlord for non-leasehold properties. There should be no cross-subsidy - although clearly council tenants, who can take no fiscal benefit from the works, cannot be expected either to pay for them. Any possible cross subsidy would be between leaseholders and the council for non-leasehold properties. How the council recoups their costs for non-leasehold properties is up to them - either through rents or local taxes (or through selling some capital assets to pay for the upkeep of others).


Capital works (repair or refurbishment) either preserve or improve the value of property - those without a stake in that value (i.e. council tenants) are, it seems to me, more reasonably excused the costs of these, even where they benefit from living in a 'better' environment. The same would be true of private tenants benefiting from such works undertaken by a private landlord.

Hi


I can't help but I do remember a number of threads on the forum about this over the years, many in the same position as yourself. As an example (with some potentially helpful contact details) see here: http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1555979,page=1


I do remember another thread about someone who had asked for an itemized invoice and through this was able to show she was being charged for communal works which were never carried out.

Hi lordship girl,

Do challenge. Perhaps worth joining seeking advice from http://www.las2000.org Leaseholders Associate of southwark who are well versed in fighting such bills.


Also perhaps worth noting. Around 30 houses in East Dulwich the council own the freehold but both flats are leasehold. I'm always amazed those leaseholders have followed the leaseholder enfranchisement and bought the freehold form the council - as i the leaseholders right. If this is you then you can calculate what the cost of doing this would be via one of many online calculators - https://www.freeholdcalculator.com/freehold_choose.php this is the first ot pop up in a Google search.

We are also still awaiting our final bill from 2016.

I had so many issues with saltash, but got their attention pretty quickly when I emailed Southwark council CEO and cc?d in Helen Hayes together with saltash contact and any council contacts we had met along the way.


3 lots of scaffolding on same area where pointing was missed, I?ve really put them through the ringer, not let them get away with anything, workmanship is shoddy to say the least.


I?m paying on DD so I?m not yet at a point that I have paid them more than I assume the work should have cost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...