Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello;


The prospect of school selection has now been thrust upon us for our 3 1/2 year old cherub for 2012 admission. Having fully expected to have long flown London by now, jobs have contrived for us to be staying firmly put in south dulwich.


We rent and need to move house soon, since a recent addition of a second child means we need more space. I am therefore thinking it might make good sense to move to a house right bang outside the school of our choice.


I would have thought though there may be some criteria relating to how long a family must have lived somewhere in order to meet catchent area criteria, but I have not found anything about this on school websites. Would anyone have had experience of this before?


The school we are currently thinking of is rosendale, but we are flexible to move next to a number of good schools in the area, or even completley different parts of London or surrounding counties.


Many thanks in advance.


J+M

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19197-school-catchment-area-criteria/
Share on other sites

as far as I know, you just need to be in your new address upon application to schools in January. If you were in a rental, they apparently can ask for evidence of a contract that would take you into the start of the school year. The Southwark admissions policy brochure is a good place to start - a new version should be out soon but the existing one on the council web site explains residence criteria.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Apparently a tourist tax was Raynor's idea, but Reeves has put the kibosh on it because of the push-back she'll get from businesses
    • But a larger number, in a more hotly contested election, didn't. It is an anomaly that Starmer won a landslide in seats with a turnout for Labour which would have shamed Labour leaders in all the 21st and much of the post war 20th century.
    • I was not suggesting anything else!   I'm not sure how you interpret what I said  as "irrelevant"? I was responding to a post saying that Corbyn was "unelectable". My point was that a  large number  of the electorate  voted for him!
    • that's exactly what happened - Brickhouse were forced to close due to rent hike and then Gail's didn't move in until covid restrictions lifted and normality resumed. Gail's would have opened much sooner as they were lined up and able to offer the landlord much higher rents. Brickhouse was a local favourite
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...